linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: PM: Skip devices in D0 for suspend-to-idle
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 23:46:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jD9Ln1+fUJHCRxRu4ZYtnesah3+cohysGr5jbxSwyrXg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190613213823.GM13533@google.com>

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 11:38 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 12:14:02AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> >
> > Commit d491f2b75237 ("PCI: PM: Avoid possible suspend-to-idle issue")
> > attempted to avoid a problem with devices whose drivers want them to
> > stay in D0 over suspend-to-idle and resume, but it did not go as far
> > as it should with that.
> >
> > Namely, first of all, it is questionable to change the power state
> > of a PCI bridge with a device in D0 under it, but that is not
> > actively prevented from happening during system-wide PM transitions,
> > so use the skip_bus_pm flag introduced by commit d491f2b75237 for
> > that.
>
> I think it's more than questionable.  I think a bridge is *required*
> to be in D0 if any downstream device is in D0.  Based on the PCI PM
> spec r1.2, sec 6, table 6-1, if the bridge is not in D0, there can be
> no PCI transactions on its secondary bus.

Fair enough.

> > Second, the configuration of devices left in D0 (whatever the reason)
> > during suspend-to-idle need not be changed and attempting to put them
> > into D0 again by force may confuse some firmware, so explicitly avoid
> > doing that.
>
> I don't know what to do with "may confuse some firmware"; it doesn't
> say what firmware is affected or why, so it sort of leads to "we can
> never touch this code because we don't know what might break."
>
> But IMO the first reason by itself is more than enough to keep a
> bridge in D0 if any downstream device is in D0.

OK, so I'll replace the phrase "may confuse some firmware" with "is pointless".

> > Fixes: d491f2b75237 ("PCI: PM: Avoid possible suspend-to-idle issue")
> > Reported-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Tested on Dell XPS13 9360 with no issues.
> >
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/pci-driver.c |   47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> >  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-pm/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> > +++ linux-pm/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
> > @@ -524,7 +524,6 @@ static void pci_pm_default_resume_early(
> >       pci_power_up(pci_dev);
> >       pci_restore_state(pci_dev);
> >       pci_pme_restore(pci_dev);
> > -     pci_fixup_device(pci_fixup_resume_early, pci_dev);
> >  }
> >
> >  /*
> > @@ -842,18 +841,16 @@ static int pci_pm_suspend_noirq(struct d
> >
> >       if (pci_dev->skip_bus_pm) {
> >               /*
> > -              * The function is running for the second time in a row without
> > +              * Either the device is a bridge with a child in D0 below it, or
> > +              * the function is running for the second time in a row without
> >                * going through full resume, which is possible only during
> > -              * suspend-to-idle in a spurious wakeup case.  Moreover, the
> > -              * device was originally left in D0, so its power state should
> > -              * not be changed here and the device register values saved
> > -              * originally should be restored on resume again.
> > +              * suspend-to-idle in a spurious wakeup case.  The device should
> > +              * be in D0 at this point, but if it is a bridge, it may be
> > +              * necessary to save its state.
> >                */
> > -             pci_dev->state_saved = true;
> > -     } else if (pci_dev->state_saved) {
> > -             if (pci_dev->current_state == PCI_D0)
> > -                     pci_dev->skip_bus_pm = true;
> > -     } else {
> > +             if (!pci_dev->state_saved)
> > +                     pci_save_state(pci_dev);
> > +     } else if (!pci_dev->state_saved) {
> >               pci_save_state(pci_dev);
> >               if (pci_power_manageable(pci_dev))
> >                       pci_prepare_to_sleep(pci_dev);
> > @@ -862,6 +859,22 @@ static int pci_pm_suspend_noirq(struct d
> >       dev_dbg(dev, "PCI PM: Suspend power state: %s\n",
> >               pci_power_name(pci_dev->current_state));
> >
> > +     if (pci_dev->current_state == PCI_D0) {
> > +             pci_dev->skip_bus_pm = true;
> > +             /*
> > +              * Changing the power state of a PCI bridge with a device in D0
> > +              * below it is questionable, so avoid doing that by setting the
> > +              * skip_bus_pm flag for the parent bridge.
>
> Maybe "Per PCI PM r1.2, table 6-1, a bridge must be in D0 if any
> downstream device is in D0"?

OK

> > +              */
> > +             if (pci_dev->bus->self)
> > +                     pci_dev->bus->self->skip_bus_pm = true;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     if (pci_dev->skip_bus_pm && !pm_suspend_via_firmware()) {
> > +             dev_dbg(dev, "PCI PM: Skipped\n");
> > +             goto Fixup;
> > +     }
> > +
> >       pci_pm_set_unknown_state(pci_dev);
> >
> >       /*
> > @@ -909,7 +922,16 @@ static int pci_pm_resume_noirq(struct de
> >       if (dev_pm_smart_suspend_and_suspended(dev))
> >               pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
> >
> > -     pci_pm_default_resume_early(pci_dev);
> > +     /*
> > +      * In the suspend-to-idle case, devices left in D0 during suspend will
> > +      * stay in D0, so it is not necessary to restore or update their
> > +      * configuration here and attempting to put them into D0 again may
> > +      * confuse some firmware, so avoid doing that.
> > +      */
> > +     if (!pci_dev->skip_bus_pm || pm_suspend_via_firmware())
> > +             pci_pm_default_resume_early(pci_dev);
> > +
> > +     pci_fixup_device(pci_fixup_resume_early, pci_dev);
> >
> >       if (pci_has_legacy_pm_support(pci_dev))
> >               return pci_legacy_resume_early(dev);
> > @@ -1200,6 +1222,7 @@ static int pci_pm_restore_noirq(struct d
> >       }
> >
> >       pci_pm_default_resume_early(pci_dev);
> > +     pci_fixup_device(pci_fixup_resume_early, pci_dev);
> >
> >       if (pci_has_legacy_pm_support(pci_dev))
> >               return pci_legacy_resume_early(dev);
> >

I'll send a v2 shortly.

      reply	other threads:[~2019-06-13 21:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-12 22:14 [PATCH] PCI: PM: Skip devices in D0 for suspend-to-idle Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-06-13  6:13 ` Kai-Heng Feng
2019-06-13 12:57 ` Mika Westerberg
2019-06-13 18:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-06-13 21:38 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-06-13 21:46   ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJZ5v0jD9Ln1+fUJHCRxRu4ZYtnesah3+cohysGr5jbxSwyrXg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).