From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Krogerus, Heikki" <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/6] ACPI: glue: Eliminate acpi_platform_notify()
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 20:38:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jF=T2djhVT0ZY0hdThez=S7w6XeJfnBz38HfO2FXQcKw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YOyLj4/s9Sclo/Wl@smile.fi.intel.com>
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 8:36 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 07:25:55PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> >
> > Get rid of acpi_platform_notify() which is redundant and
> > make device_platform_notify() in the driver core call
> > acpi_device_notify() and acpi_device_notify_remove() directly.
>
> > + if (action == KOBJ_ADD)
> > + acpi_device_notify(dev);
> > + else if (action == KOBJ_REMOVE)
> > + acpi_device_notify_remove(dev);
>
> In most of the cases we are using switch-case approach with
> KOBJ_ADD/KOBJ_REMOVE. Would it make sense to keep that pattern?
Well, this goes away in the next patches anyway.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-12 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-12 17:19 [PATCH v1 0/6] ACPI: glue / driver core: Eliminate acpi_platform_notify() and split device_platform_notify() Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-07-12 17:23 ` [PATCH v1 1/6] ACPI: glue: Rearrange acpi_device_notify() Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-07-12 17:23 ` [PATCH v1 2/6] ACPI: glue: Change return type of two functions to void Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-07-12 17:24 ` [PATCH v1 3/6] ACPI: bus: Rename functions to avoid name collision Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-07-12 17:25 ` [PATCH v1 4/6] ACPI: glue: Eliminate acpi_platform_notify() Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-07-12 18:35 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-07-12 18:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2021-07-12 17:27 ` [PATCH v1 5/6] software nodes: Split software_node_notify() Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-07-12 18:03 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-07-12 18:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-07-12 18:57 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-07-12 19:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-07-13 7:46 ` Heikki Krogerus
2021-07-14 18:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-07-12 17:28 ` [PATCH v1 6/6] driver core: Split device_platform_notify() Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-07-12 18:04 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-07-12 18:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-07-12 18:04 ` [PATCH v1 0/6] ACPI: glue / driver core: Eliminate acpi_platform_notify() and split device_platform_notify() Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-07-12 18:39 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-07-14 18:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJZ5v0jF=T2djhVT0ZY0hdThez=S7w6XeJfnBz38HfO2FXQcKw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).