From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02ADACA9EA0 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 10:01:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD40E2064B for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 10:01:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1571738515; bh=zU77JOPItwE0kfL2VdVJZpqjmZAJj7PLPPh8VoTKlPI=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=k0Wx25saWrSftagAfOgx7ZROtQTx8eiYjkkcaBxghBknrfDUmtnB9KjpRHkZwe5uZ 32pmF0sAH1OD0JrwA8nHNxGD3y89EOeKwaiGxJvqrBPS6X2cLmd4Gh3oE6VGqH05pg OuPe9eulRWC0fuUrC/VchGQ0kDP/2bIDPXejT/kA= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731661AbfJVKBy (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Oct 2019 06:01:54 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-f196.google.com ([209.85.167.196]:39759 "EHLO mail-oi1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727101AbfJVKBx (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Oct 2019 06:01:53 -0400 Received: by mail-oi1-f196.google.com with SMTP id w144so13656852oia.6; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 03:01:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QymUh+Fku1vQVHvu/DETUtAo+Qu6b8CnaBuQss7KKWQ=; b=h2iFRY8kvTIp3uSv1xdak5KNpDhBffU8tz5cQttN6wCNauPnlPr4C5ZPCzDK5CEjVa Jxoa41P5dwq9bKhkzqx0Lhpe3IpS9iFh9cyJ3exTdWgUzJ6R+9ID9etOk3itNUlrar2D XYT0qtXndeRj9xZtnfwNHPtyn0MofhuSzR1VX+og2nVBKLSnEFyMwBpZeIHjZ8WPEg5K TRHJZ9fOqANYXYSxnM2D98uyiYJbtjOwM5X9RI90k+PrtRht3xEJJhiPmQx7AT9si9UM hA1O2FwqFUJUiCozB/kw6xe9MWnkXAuC990fm+qCTFujfjkbLRyGorM16gj6rzx+yPZA 07tw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWTo+kUSUZW11FBs6JEIIRg89XQoX2SG8iweGe3VcITONwczN4m pCbAufSGXt3fuEq6mWhOJ1bXI0QjGhu5O60Zt6M= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwN0bxJxdIvFNnaNORZKQBNabY4ldLgTUIlNjE1Z7rAnNoVLH34CBEzb2jBIdbGQUA6pt46njyJIVaN1WsCNSA= X-Received: by 2002:aca:d405:: with SMTP id l5mr2047939oig.115.1571738512905; Tue, 22 Oct 2019 03:01:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <157118756627.2063440.9878062995925617180.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <157118757175.2063440.9248947575330904096.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 12:01:42 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/12] acpi/numa: Establish a new drivers/acpi/numa/ directory To: Dan Williams Cc: Ingo Molnar , Len Brown , Keith Busch , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Dave Hansen , Peter Zijlstra , Vishal Verma , Ard Biesheuvel , "the arch/x86 maintainers" , linux-efi , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ACPI Devel Maling List , Jonathan Cameron Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 11:25 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 3:13 AM Dan Williams wrote: > > > > Currently hmat.c lives under an "hmat" directory which does not enhance > > the description of the file. The initial motivation for giving hmat.c > > its own directory was to delineate it as mm functionality in contrast to > > ACPI device driver functionality. > > > > As ACPI continues to play an increasing role in conveying > > memory location and performance topology information to the OS take the > > opportunity to co-locate these NUMA relevant tables in a combined > > directory. > > > > numa.c is renamed to srat.c and moved to drivers/acpi/numa/ along with > > hmat.c. > > > > Cc: Len Brown > > Cc: Keith Busch > > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > > Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen > > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams > > Please note that https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11078171/ is being > pushed to Linus (it is overdue anyway), so if it is pulled, there will > be a merge conflict with this patch. > > Respin maybe? Actually, would you mind it if I took this one into the ACPI tree right away? There's https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11198373/ queued up that, again, will clash with it. Also, there is the generic Initiator proximity domains series from Jonathan depending on it and I would like to move forward with that one if there are no objections.