From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D44CCC433E0 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 19:17:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87D4464DD6 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 19:17:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234318AbhBBTQn (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2021 14:16:43 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-f43.google.com ([209.85.210.43]:45106 "EHLO mail-ot1-f43.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234558AbhBBTBo (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2021 14:01:44 -0500 Received: by mail-ot1-f43.google.com with SMTP id n42so20873357ota.12; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 11:01:28 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7c/SpUzGMJvfhT9d/3bvqW/cNh7KiE+wRFD8OSEwEkY=; b=jOWrSbW4ly0EtWDF/GJsQov47PlqxgTMOLzvpoqnNzb87uH8ZI6J0fLzlwA9AYWM+T FNtjXsrquuOOj8pemksh3F83zYygDjws9n/W8zrma+u+JPFfx5QNXoRDgULUXR+6U8Hc BF2UfEUb32AUsA64DYdfnbdZxVr7dxTJuxDfzWXZbOCwbsU/pKNPfUmQDFc2k5/fOfrH iIP/q8+QGoqVi9kl6Uh+dYPdO/VlPv4EO5JNVC6fKnFTjA33kOzdvsBbpReUlHbPbVVY tIrXXdtsS3vk5BZ9ajZT4Wc/k7RgJv16DxeCrVzhOE1VAVUTkP3Yrw1iz8jvJDmpiYAS wRrw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530npFrb9/6RqzQcT0nA4IFzQFJxVJ618VOM+2MyqFxA3Wcg4VrQ IX+cpJXtLOdRAUR+dw6jyFdYAaIx4hP6Ld53SHg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy5y3o42Ck2CXfv6vfBWEhbmbAhOSfOyQebNjSEq4QtbYxDypppaqQtG6BwjJKjOJWJ0GAHEhSlIHPu8L8yNZs= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:2313:: with SMTP id u19mr16961711ote.321.1612292460714; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 11:01:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210122204038.3238-1-ggherdovich@suse.cz> <20210122204038.3238-2-ggherdovich@suse.cz> <1611652167.11983.65.camel@suse.cz> <20210126093140.GB3592@techsingularity.net> <1611933781.15858.48.camel@suse.cz> <1612275425.27785.70.camel@suse.cz> In-Reply-To: From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 20:00:49 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] x86,sched: On AMD EPYC set freq_max = max_boost in schedutil invariant formula To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Giovanni Gherdovich , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Mel Gorman , Borislav Petkov , Ingo Molnar , Viresh Kumar , Jon Grimm , Nathan Fontenot , Yazen Ghannam , Thomas Lendacky , Suthikulpanit Suravee , Pu Wen , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Michael Larabel , "the arch/x86 maintainers" , Linux PM , Linux Kernel Mailing List , ACPI Devel Maling List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 7:29 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 7:24 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 03:17:05PM +0100, Giovanni Gherdovich wrote: > > > Hello Rafael, > > > > > > you haven't replied to this patch, which was written aiming at v5.11. > > > > I've tentatively queued this for x86/urgent, but ideally this goes > > through a cpufreq tree. Rafael, Viresh? > > I've missed it, sorry. > > I can queue it up tomorrow if all goes well. So actually I'm not sure about it. Looks overly complicated to me.