linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@redhat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: mst@redhat.com, leiyang@redhat.com,
	Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
	sgarzare@redhat.com, Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, si-wei.liu@oracle.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lulu@redhat.com,
	Gautam Dawar <gdawar@xilinx.com>,
	alvaro.karsz@solid-run.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vdpa_sim: not reset state in vdpasim_queue_ready
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 10:14:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJaqyWejkbiwKK4O0qOObdf294YrzMeSRTVoWNzv75yQCvkJqQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACGkMEt=po+FMEikgj3OXC7_QC=yhRP2Sx0NU=2sFPGgQ4bujA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 4:16 AM Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 12:44 AM Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > vdpasim_queue_ready calls vringh_init_iotlb, which resets split indexes.
> > But it can be called after setting a ring base with
> > vdpasim_set_vq_state.
> >
> > Fix it by stashing them. They're still resetted in vdpasim_vq_reset.
> >
> > This was discovered and tested live migrating the vdpa_sim_net device.
> >
> > Fixes: 2c53d0f64c06 ("vdpasim: vDPA device simulator")
> > Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
> > index cb88891b44a8..8839232a3fcb 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
> > @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ static void vdpasim_vq_notify(struct vringh *vring)
> >  static void vdpasim_queue_ready(struct vdpasim *vdpasim, unsigned int idx)
> >  {
> >         struct vdpasim_virtqueue *vq = &vdpasim->vqs[idx];
> > +       uint16_t last_avail_idx = vq->vring.last_avail_idx;
> >
> >         vringh_init_iotlb(&vq->vring, vdpasim->features, vq->num, false,
> >                           (struct vring_desc *)(uintptr_t)vq->desc_addr,
> > @@ -74,6 +75,7 @@ static void vdpasim_queue_ready(struct vdpasim *vdpasim, unsigned int idx)
> >                           (struct vring_used *)
> >                           (uintptr_t)vq->device_addr);
> >
> > +       vq->vring.last_avail_idx = last_avail_idx;
>
> Does this need to be serialized with the datapath?
>
> E.g in set_vq_state() we do:
>
> spin_lock(&vdpasim->lock);
> vrh->last_avail_idx = state->split.avail_index;
> spin_unlock(&vdpasim->lock);
>

vdpasim_queue_ready is called from vdpasim_set_vq_ready, which holds
these locks.

Maybe it's too much indirection and to embed vdpasim_queue_ready in
vdpasim_set_vq_ready would be clearer for the future?

Thanks!


  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-19  9:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-18 16:43 [PATCH 0/2] Fix expected set_vq_state behavior on vdpa_sim Eugenio Pérez
2023-01-18 16:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] vdpa_sim: not reset state in vdpasim_queue_ready Eugenio Pérez
2023-01-19  3:16   ` Jason Wang
2023-01-19  9:14     ` Eugenio Perez Martin [this message]
2023-01-29  5:56       ` Jason Wang
2023-01-31 15:44         ` Lei Yang
2023-01-18 16:43 ` [PATCH 2/2] vringh: fetch used_idx from vring at vringh_init_iotlb Eugenio Pérez
2023-01-19  3:20   ` Jason Wang
2023-01-19  8:10     ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-01-29  6:00       ` Jason Wang
2023-01-30 16:38         ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-01-31  3:16           ` Jason Wang
2023-01-31  7:58             ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-02-13 12:03               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-01 16:11   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-01 17:24     ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-01-27 10:53 ` [PATCH 0/2] Fix expected set_vq_state behavior on vdpa_sim Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJaqyWejkbiwKK4O0qOObdf294YrzMeSRTVoWNzv75yQCvkJqQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=alvaro.karsz@solid-run.com \
    --cc=gdawar@xilinx.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=leiyang@redhat.com \
    --cc=lingshan.zhu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lulu@redhat.com \
    --cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=si-wei.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).