From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11303C10F11 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 13:53:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5476218D2 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 13:53:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="key not found in DNS" (0-bit key) header.d=szeredi.hu header.i=@szeredi.hu header.b="CTHN3J5e" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730784AbfDXNxn (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Apr 2019 09:53:43 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-f65.google.com ([209.85.166.65]:43799 "EHLO mail-io1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730096AbfDXNxm (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Apr 2019 09:53:42 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-f65.google.com with SMTP id v9so51106iol.10 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 06:53:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=szeredi.hu; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Tf3CjB2PxTkU5TU2/EIND2+4qjOUWPIkBjwis1N6aXo=; b=CTHN3J5er1UnnDYGsGk6fG/x9KcrMTyT0pO9eOPWkrUqFMGNW4b/SFje6V8IyIyph7 aPiQWIo+RCw492hYTVhoIEyPEIuGLDWPGebEFrNnR7IkUdMBDz4BE21Qasxk/Kva51FV zsGb3+2dQmu7XEmWsr/TqxnDBE1YyZ0+VjU+M= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Tf3CjB2PxTkU5TU2/EIND2+4qjOUWPIkBjwis1N6aXo=; b=OAWY9ndA4V4FoyCcwCtYnZjIKT6XuXkXwipE0zCJzYLOpUcoFbMF3d2IDzca1xybQo F37RwM8J4qtMZP84RLLhKOvtmWaUmZDr7BhytvEs9LplrRfCT2RqD0BIhV/jkMLdgT+t 8/FXf5JFXbh+r6mMYQ2M6otmNaK+exP3aV2vZSglrkIa9hgusuq6UDgjaMnin2+YLsCv SuyES9uLIzweqlUWRGh9aMR1mjxulcbF3gm5xyOn3o3lnz5rf2oRP4UCwFtu6BZe7M4s kHliqoBn0IpahfTJNz0Ws9O6CU6cbbEnjdMyMyFJobvv4vWPpnu0zqSqgPlXfKasUL0R rPQA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWjDRHO6CBBZlnbdzeQmqYAG/BaN2+s7KyRkM1tVgPPtwyAp/4s XB17M2FdOqH48H0ioQRZMt7vdWZwZtbt4DjaSGK/xQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxxv+5c6L0yVlsd+hDlEzMH7SD5bF2E6fJRJeUAXdiFbsQdCUjqciPfSqc7+kX99Uio9tTWYsiJlr4SAbl5smE= X-Received: by 2002:a5e:8202:: with SMTP id l2mr18074592iom.144.1556114021179; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 06:53:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <155372999953.7602.13784796495137723805.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <155373036414.7602.7964458548629410897.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <155373036414.7602.7964458548629410897.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> From: Miklos Szeredi Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 15:53:29 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 44/68] vfs: Convert fuse to use the new mount API To: David Howells Cc: Al Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 12:46 AM David Howells wrote: > > Convert the fuse filesystem to the new internal mount API as the old > one will be obsoleted and removed. This allows greater flexibility in > communication of mount parameters between userspace, the VFS and the > filesystem. > > See Documentation/filesystems/mount_api.txt for more information. Should I be applying this, together with the vfs dependencies? Or will you take care of these? One minor comment is that fuse conventionally uses "struct fuse_conn *fc", so "struct fs_context *fc" is confusing here. There's one place you use "struct fs_context *fsc", which seems the right thing to do for all the cases. Thanks, Miklos