From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
"Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
"Josh Triplett" <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
oleg@redhat.com, "Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/10] workqueue: Eliminate cond_resched_rcu_qs() in favor of cond_resched()
Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2017 09:06:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJhGHyB00TXQfYh08cztdgHPPYr9t_Frcthi4ooWB9aQ2kvqRQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1512156104-20104-5-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 3:21 AM, Paul E. McKenney
<paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Now that cond_resched() also provides RCU quiescent states when
> needed, it can be used in place of cond_resched_rcu_qs(). This
> commit therefore makes this change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/workqueue.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index 8fdb710bfdd7..aee7eaab05cb 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -2135,7 +2135,7 @@ __acquires(&pool->lock)
> * stop_machine. At the same time, report a quiescent RCU state so
> * the same condition doesn't freeze RCU.
> */
> - cond_resched_rcu_qs();
> + cond_resched();
>
> spin_lock_irq(&pool->lock);
>
> --
> 2.5.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-02 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-01 19:21 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/10] Don not IPI offline CPUs, de-emphasize cond_resched_rcu_qs() Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-01 19:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/10] sched: Stop resched_cpu() from sending IPIs to offline CPUs Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-01 19:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/10] sched: Stop switched_to_rt() " Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-01 19:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/10] netfilter: Eliminate cond_resched_rcu_qs() in favor of cond_resched() Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-01 19:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/10] mm: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-01 19:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/10] workqueue: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-02 1:06 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2017-12-04 18:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-01 19:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/10] trace: " Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-24 20:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-02-25 17:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-25 18:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-25 18:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-27 2:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-02-27 15:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-28 23:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-03-01 1:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-03-01 5:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-03-01 20:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-03-02 20:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-03-03 0:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-02-26 4:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-02-26 5:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-01 19:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/10] softirq: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-01 19:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/10] fs: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-01 19:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/10] doc: " Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-01 19:21 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/10] rcu: Account for rcu_all_qs() in cond_resched() Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-02 8:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-02 12:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-12-02 13:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-24 20:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-02-25 17:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJhGHyB00TXQfYh08cztdgHPPYr9t_Frcthi4ooWB9aQ2kvqRQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).