From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL VIRTUAL MACHINE FOR MIPS (KVM/mips)"
<kvm@vger.kernel.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Remove the useless struct mmu_page_path
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 17:43:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJhGHyB=-bGrguLKtTh+EAr5zr--H97HUgR3WP=JTovQLkoevQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YtcQ1GuTAttXaUk+@google.com>
On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 4:15 AM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> wrote:
>
> Nit, s/useless/now-unused, or "no longer used". I associate "useless" in shortlogs
> as "this <xyz> is pointless and always has been pointless", whereas "now-unused"
> is likely to be interpreted as "remove <xyz> as it's no longer used after recent
> changes".
>
> Alternatively, can this patch be squashed with the patch that removes
> mmu_pages_clear_parents()? Yeah, it'll be a (much?) larger patch, but leaving
> dead code behind is arguably worse.
Defined by the C-language and the machine, struct mmu_page_path is used
in for_each_sp() and the data is set and updated every iteration.
It is not really dead code.
Defined by the sematic that we want, gathering unsync pages,
we don't need struct mmu_page_path, since the struct is not used
by "someone reading it".
>
> On Sun, Jun 05, 2022, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> > From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com>
> >
> > struct mmu_page_path is set and updated but never used since
> > mmu_pages_clear_parents() is removed.
> >
> > Remove it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com>
> > ---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-21 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-05 6:43 [PATCH 00/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Simpliy mmu_unsync_walk() Lai Jiangshan
2022-06-05 6:43 ` [PATCH 01/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Warn if sp->unsync_children > 0 in link_shadow_page() Lai Jiangshan
2022-06-05 6:43 ` [PATCH 02/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Rename kvm_unlink_unsync_page() to kvm_mmu_page_clear_unsync() Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-14 22:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-05 6:43 ` [PATCH 03/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Split a part of kvm_unsync_page() as kvm_mmu_page_mark_unsync() Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-14 22:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-05 6:43 ` [PATCH 04/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Remove mmu_pages_clear_parents() Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-14 23:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-05 6:43 ` [PATCH 05/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Clear unsync bit directly in __mmu_unsync_walk() Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-19 19:52 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-21 9:32 ` Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-21 16:26 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-05 6:43 ` [PATCH 06/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Rename mmu_unsync_walk() to mmu_unsync_walk_and_clear() Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-19 20:07 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-05 6:43 ` [PATCH 07/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Remove the useless struct mmu_page_path Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-19 20:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-07-21 9:43 ` Lai Jiangshan [this message]
2022-07-21 15:25 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-05 6:43 ` [PATCH 08/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Remove the useless idx from struct kvm_mmu_pages Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-19 20:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-05 6:43 ` [PATCH 09/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Unfold struct mmu_page_and_offset in " Lai Jiangshan
2022-06-05 6:43 ` [PATCH 10/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Don't add parents to " Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-19 20:34 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-05 6:43 ` [PATCH 11/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Remove mmu_pages_first() and mmu_pages_next() Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-19 20:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-06-05 6:43 ` [PATCH 12/12] KVM: X86/MMU: Rename struct kvm_mmu_pages to struct kvm_mmu_page_vec Lai Jiangshan
2022-07-19 20:45 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJhGHyB=-bGrguLKtTh+EAr5zr--H97HUgR3WP=JTovQLkoevQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshan.ljs@antgroup.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).