linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
To: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libbpf: Remove the duplicate checking of function storage
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 18:46:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJpBn1zT1EnyKnzmoEO_4WwjR1qgY94wcQjHdKUPAa5z+5OvXw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180821161258.19718-1-treeze.taeung@gmail.com>

On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 6:12 PM, Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com> wrote:
> After the commit eac7d84519a3 ("tools: libbpf: don't return '.text'
> as a program for multi-function programs"), bpf_program__next()
> in bpf_object__for_each_program skips the function storage such as .text,
> so eliminate the duplicate checking.
>
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
> Signed-off-by: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com>

Looks reasonable, but you may need to repost once bpf-next is open:

https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.txt

Acked-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>

> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index 2abd0f112627..8476da7f2720 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -2336,7 +2336,7 @@ int bpf_prog_load_xattr(const struct bpf_prog_load_attr *attr,
>                 bpf_program__set_expected_attach_type(prog,
>                                                       expected_attach_type);
>
> -               if (!bpf_program__is_function_storage(prog, obj) && !first_prog)
> +               if (!first_prog)
>                         first_prog = prog;
>         }
>
> --
> 2.17.1
>

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-21 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-21 16:12 [PATCH] libbpf: Remove the duplicate checking of function storage Taeung Song
2018-08-21 16:46 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2018-08-21 20:11   ` Daniel Borkmann
2018-08-22  2:54     ` Taeung Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJpBn1zT1EnyKnzmoEO_4WwjR1qgY94wcQjHdKUPAa5z+5OvXw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=treeze.taeung@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).