From: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
To: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@google.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>,
Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 03/16] sched/core: uclamp: Enforce last task's UCLAMP_MAX
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:36:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJuCfpHN4kMBScdEdJodtmbHQ2qhVDnXrJKFDdaSYyjWH0JH5Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190402104153.25404-4-patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
Hi Patrick,
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 3:42 AM Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com> wrote:
>
> When a task sleeps it removes its max utilization clamp from its CPU.
> However, the blocked utilization on that CPU can be higher than the max
> clamp value enforced while the task was running. This allows undesired
> CPU frequency increases while a CPU is idle, for example, when another
> CPU on the same frequency domain triggers a frequency update, since
> schedutil can now see the full not clamped blocked utilization of the
> idle CPU.
>
> Fix this by using
> uclamp_rq_dec_id(p, rq, UCLAMP_MAX)
> uclamp_rq_max_value(rq, UCLAMP_MAX, clamp_value)
> to detect when a CPU has no more RUNNABLE clamped tasks and to flag this
> condition.
>
If I understand the intent correctly, you are trying to exclude idle
CPUs from affecting calculations of rq UCLAMP_MAX value. If that is
true I think description can be simplified a bit :) In particular it
took me some time to understand what "blocked utilization" means,
however if it's a widely accepted term then feel free to ignore my
input.
> Don't track any minimum utilization clamps since an idle CPU never
> requires a minimum frequency. The decay of the blocked utilization is
> good enough to reduce the CPU frequency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
>
> --
> Changes in v8:
> Message-ID: <20190314170619.rt6yhelj3y6dzypu@e110439-lin>
> - moved flag reset into uclamp_rq_inc()
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 6e1beae5f348..046f61d33f00 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -754,8 +754,35 @@ static inline unsigned int uclamp_none(int clamp_id)
> return SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE;
> }
>
> +static inline unsigned int
> +uclamp_idle_value(struct rq *rq, unsigned int clamp_id, unsigned int clamp_value)
> +{
> + /*
> + * Avoid blocked utilization pushing up the frequency when we go
> + * idle (which drops the max-clamp) by retaining the last known
> + * max-clamp.
> + */
> + if (clamp_id == UCLAMP_MAX) {
> + rq->uclamp_flags |= UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE;
> + return clamp_value;
> + }
> +
> + return uclamp_none(UCLAMP_MIN);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void uclamp_idle_reset(struct rq *rq, unsigned int clamp_id,
> + unsigned int clamp_value)
> +{
> + /* Reset max-clamp retention only on idle exit */
> + if (!(rq->uclamp_flags & UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE))
> + return;
> +
> + WRITE_ONCE(rq->uclamp[clamp_id].value, clamp_value);
> +}
> +
> static inline
> -unsigned int uclamp_rq_max_value(struct rq *rq, unsigned int clamp_id)
> +unsigned int uclamp_rq_max_value(struct rq *rq, unsigned int clamp_id,
> + unsigned int clamp_value)
IMHO the name of uclamp_rq_max_value() is a bit misleading because:
1. It does not imply that it has to be called only when there are no
more runnable tasks on a CPU. This is currently the case because it's
called only from uclamp_rq_dec_id() and only when bucket->tasks==0 but
nothing in the name of this function indicates that it can't be called
from other places.
2. It does not imply that it marks rq UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE.
> {
> struct uclamp_bucket *bucket = rq->uclamp[clamp_id].bucket;
> int bucket_id = UCLAMP_BUCKETS - 1;
> @@ -771,7 +798,7 @@ unsigned int uclamp_rq_max_value(struct rq *rq, unsigned int clamp_id)
> }
>
> /* No tasks -- default clamp values */
> - return uclamp_none(clamp_id);
> + return uclamp_idle_value(rq, clamp_id, clamp_value);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -794,6 +821,8 @@ static inline void uclamp_rq_inc_id(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq,
> bucket = &uc_rq->bucket[uc_se->bucket_id];
> bucket->tasks++;
>
> + uclamp_idle_reset(rq, clamp_id, uc_se->value);
> +
> /*
> * Local max aggregation: rq buckets always track the max
> * "requested" clamp value of its RUNNABLE tasks.
> @@ -820,6 +849,7 @@ static inline void uclamp_rq_dec_id(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq,
> struct uclamp_rq *uc_rq = &rq->uclamp[clamp_id];
> struct uclamp_se *uc_se = &p->uclamp[clamp_id];
> struct uclamp_bucket *bucket;
> + unsigned int bkt_clamp;
> unsigned int rq_clamp;
>
> bucket = &uc_rq->bucket[uc_se->bucket_id];
> @@ -848,7 +878,8 @@ static inline void uclamp_rq_dec_id(struct task_struct *p, struct rq *rq,
> * there are anymore RUNNABLE tasks refcounting it.
> */
> bucket->value = uclamp_bucket_base_value(bucket->value);
> - WRITE_ONCE(uc_rq->value, uclamp_rq_max_value(rq, clamp_id));
> + bkt_clamp = uclamp_rq_max_value(rq, clamp_id, uc_se->value);
> + WRITE_ONCE(uc_rq->value, bkt_clamp);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -861,6 +892,10 @@ static inline void uclamp_rq_inc(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>
> for (clamp_id = 0; clamp_id < UCLAMP_CNT; ++clamp_id)
> uclamp_rq_inc_id(p, rq, clamp_id);
> +
> + /* Reset clamp idle holding when there is one RUNNABLE task */
> + if (rq->uclamp_flags & UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE)
> + rq->uclamp_flags &= ~UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE;
> }
>
> static inline void uclamp_rq_dec(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> @@ -879,8 +914,10 @@ static void __init init_uclamp(void)
> unsigned int clamp_id;
> int cpu;
>
> - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> memset(&cpu_rq(cpu)->uclamp, 0, sizeof(struct uclamp_rq));
> + cpu_rq(cpu)->uclamp_flags = 0;
> + }
>
> for (clamp_id = 0; clamp_id < UCLAMP_CNT; ++clamp_id) {
> struct uclamp_se *uc_se = &init_task.uclamp[clamp_id];
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index c3d1ae1e7eec..d8b182f1782c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -880,6 +880,8 @@ struct rq {
> #ifdef CONFIG_UCLAMP_TASK
> /* Utilization clamp values based on CPU's RUNNABLE tasks */
> struct uclamp_rq uclamp[UCLAMP_CNT] ____cacheline_aligned;
> + unsigned int uclamp_flags;
> +#define UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE 0x01
> #endif
>
> struct cfs_rq cfs;
> --
> 2.20.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-17 20:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-02 10:41 [PATCH v8 00/16] Add utilization clamping support Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 01/16] sched/core: uclamp: Add CPU's clamp buckets refcounting Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-06 23:51 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2019-04-08 11:49 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 02/16] sched/core: Add bucket local max tracking Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-15 14:51 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 03/16] sched/core: uclamp: Enforce last task's UCLAMP_MAX Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-17 20:36 ` Suren Baghdasaryan [this message]
2019-05-07 10:10 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 04/16] sched/core: uclamp: Add system default clamps Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-18 0:51 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2019-05-07 10:38 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-08 18:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-09 8:43 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-08 19:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-09 8:45 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-08 19:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-08 19:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-09 9:10 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-09 11:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-09 13:04 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 05/16] sched/core: Allow sched_setattr() to use the current policy Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-08 19:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-09 9:18 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-09 11:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-09 14:59 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 06/16] sched/core: uclamp: Extend sched_setattr() to support utilization clamping Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-17 22:26 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2019-05-07 11:13 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-08 19:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-09 9:24 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-08 19:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-09 9:23 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 07/16] sched/core: uclamp: Reset uclamp values on RESET_ON_FORK Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 08/16] sched/core: uclamp: Set default clamps for RT tasks Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-17 23:07 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2019-05-07 11:25 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 09/16] sched/cpufreq: uclamp: Add clamps for FAIR and " Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 10/16] sched/core: uclamp: Add uclamp_util_with() Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 11/16] sched/fair: uclamp: Add uclamp support to energy_compute() Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-09 12:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 12/16] sched/core: uclamp: Extend CPU's cgroup controller Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-18 0:12 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2019-05-07 11:42 ` Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 13/16] sched/core: uclamp: Propagate parent clamps Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 14/16] sched/core: uclamp: Propagate system defaults to root group Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 15/16] sched/core: uclamp: Use TG's clamps to restrict TASK's clamps Patrick Bellasi
2019-04-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v8 16/16] sched/core: uclamp: Update CPU's refcount on TG's clamp changes Patrick Bellasi
2019-05-09 13:02 ` [PATCH v8 00/16] Add utilization clamping support Peter Zijlstra
2019-05-09 13:09 ` Patrick Bellasi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJuCfpHN4kMBScdEdJodtmbHQ2qhVDnXrJKFDdaSYyjWH0JH5Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=surenb@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=quentin.perret@arm.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=smuckle@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tkjos@google.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).