Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] mm: introduce process_mrelease system call

[Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>]

On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 3:50 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed,  4 Aug 2021 11:50:03 -0700 Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> wrote:
>
> > In modern systems it's not unusual to have a system component monitoring
> > memory conditions of the system and tasked with keeping system memory
> > pressure under control. One way to accomplish that is to kill
> > non-essential processes to free up memory for more important ones.
> > Examples of this are Facebook's OOM killer daemon called oomd and
> > Android's low memory killer daemon called lmkd.
> > For such system component it's important to be able to free memory
> > quickly and efficiently. Unfortunately the time process takes to free
> > up its memory after receiving a SIGKILL might vary based on the state
> > of the process (uninterruptible sleep), size and OPP level of the core
> > the process is running. A mechanism to free resources of the target
> > process in a more predictable way would improve system's ability to
> > control its memory pressure.
> > Introduce process_mrelease system call that releases memory of a dying
> > process from the context of the caller. This way the memory is freed in
> > a more controllable way with CPU affinity and priority of the caller.
> > The workload of freeing the memory will also be charged to the caller.
> > The operation is allowed only on a dying process.
> >
> > After previous discussions [1, 2, 3] the decision was made [4] to introduce
> > a dedicated system call to cover this use case.
> >
> > The API is as follows,
> >
> >           int process_mrelease(int pidfd, unsigned int flags);
> >
> >         DESCRIPTION
> >           The process_mrelease() system call is used to free the memory of
> >           an exiting process.
> >
> >           The pidfd selects the process referred to by the PID file
> >           descriptor.
> >           (See pidofd_open(2) for further information)
>
> I did s/pidofd_open/pidfd_open/

Thanks!

>
> >
> >           The flags argument is reserved for future use; currently, this
> >           argument must be specified as 0.
> >
> >         RETURN VALUE
> >           On success, process_mrelease() returns 0. On error, -1 is
> >           returned and errno is set to indicate the error.
> >
> >         ERRORS
> >           EBADF  pidfd is not a valid PID file descriptor.
> >
> >           EAGAIN Failed to release part of the address space.
> >
> >           EINTR  The call was interrupted by a signal; see signal(7).
> >
> >           EINVAL flags is not 0.
> >
> >           EINVAL The memory of the task cannot be released because the
> >                  process is not exiting, the address space is shared
> >                  with another live process or there is a core dump in
> >                  progress.
> >
> >           ENOSYS This system call is not supported, for example, without
> >                  MMU support built into Linux.
> >
> >           ESRCH  The target process does not exist (i.e., it has terminated
> >                  and been waited on).
> >
> > ...
> >
> >  mm/oom_kill.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
>
> The code is nice and simple.
>
> Can we get a test suite into tools/testing/selftests?

Let me take a stab at it.
Thanks!