From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB0AC04AA7 for ; Mon, 13 May 2019 17:30:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867AF2084A for ; Mon, 13 May 2019 17:30:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1557768656; bh=1KHrVjOJIKdAkwrfnTAw3fqu9992hX+XQlQ2QX6Un8k=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:List-ID:From; b=viraNeTqTeiRcfkFhMHM06JPkqdHhRR+IoQ/B97PYxYU5EVnWAqe4vHUpG6u43y8C O7N75UZ15FTCgfLdko49JZkhYHktrViz3v/ozZ3rMivCaoUW4MuRKU+aQpfQV5yxMn XdsK1vQR8dd+Z063vLszSKfdnSc7uC4g8gN26WUA= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731765AbfEMRaz (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 May 2019 13:30:55 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-f68.google.com ([209.85.208.68]:42074 "EHLO mail-ed1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729262AbfEMRay (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 May 2019 13:30:54 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-f68.google.com with SMTP id l25so18691522eda.9 for ; Mon, 13 May 2019 10:30:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1KHrVjOJIKdAkwrfnTAw3fqu9992hX+XQlQ2QX6Un8k=; b=rL7i4rZnSN7KiY0C8uSURXLuvV0y5sU6mr8oVqS/TVXz9Un9BGa5QROe2KXaUwtVs6 vTx57HJpEa446ZHGLPIqd6GadQyhIp0RAjja3w76Y7mixzjCvSMULjtxLl6SO9NsBqf/ 7DnHLbdWDFiNAzrQ7wUxg2tG2WnKbFRnAMVKfsnUxVkRv3yM+a3A77oFoMt+M3xr6Ir3 s6dRn/wv3WffLC6F54ezvrqORWm74Ybys0Q+P+gEW2sFnGyeP7NI/e8B0X3r+HmXuDyt aaJpe60iganN8Aoav3CMj4thCCdqycIZy1/X60dD8QKu8zcsTbK+KCGhRKaMTNsDq1Ln 58/A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUwRBFL+xxUmJnl7j/5A3RqGnT7tIDJVMzIFOZVyHKeRzhbSjhz C+xxvA43vm1MJ6Hc22G7vNZXG7CuCafxxZSzWeI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz3oM4dVwEL3Z4or3ot8AjgF3yS6/CtEOpPWhmoHuOpZkFf7CiRlv8SMfATlSur7WhDOL6i54/HdMOy9+LVDT8= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4c90:: with SMTP id q16mr13150005eju.297.1557768653238; Mon, 13 May 2019 10:30:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6f53f0e494d743c79e18f6e3a98085711e6ddd0c.1557177585.git.len.brown@intel.com> In-Reply-To: From: Len Brown Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 13:30:42 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/22] perf/x86/intel/uncore: renames in response to multi-die/pkg support To: "Liang, Kan" Cc: X86 ML , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 11:02 AM Liang, Kan wrote: > > I think the "box" terminology in perf uncore has different meaning. It > stands for an uncore PMU unit on a socket/die. > I think it may be better use "die" to replace the "pkg". > How about the patch as below? Also fine with me. And I've replaced my rename patch with yours here too. thanks, Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center