linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Cc: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>,
	linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] leds: leds-pwm: Convert to use devm_get_pwm
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 09:34:12 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK5ve-K69=NqApFTFOZB7Z_KXcRLaWExzbkUhP=GeASMB7JYqw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50BDB016.7010908@ti.com>

On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> wrote:
> Hi Bryan,
>
> On 12/03/2012 07:32 PM, Bryan Wu wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:13 AM, Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> wrote:
>> Actually, I'm waiting for some feedback from DT maintainers about this
>> new binding. But it looks find to me.
>
> Would it be possible to have the first (or even better the first two) patch
> going for 3.8 and we can leave the DT bindings for 3.9?
> I would like to clean up, fix some of the OMAP related board files for 3.9
> which would need the patches for the leds-pwm driver itself.
>

What's best thing I can do is I can merge these patchset into my
-devel branch, after 3.8 merge window close I will move this -devel
branch to my for-next branch for 3.9 merge window.

Does this make sense to you?

Thanks,
-Bryan

  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-04 17:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-12 14:41 [PATCH v2 0/3] leds: leds-pwm: Device tree support Peter Ujfalusi
2012-11-12 14:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] leds: leds-pwm: Convert to use devm_get_pwm Peter Ujfalusi
2012-11-14  1:14   ` Bryan Wu
2012-11-14  7:13     ` Peter Ujfalusi
2012-12-03 14:13     ` Peter Ujfalusi
2012-12-03 18:32       ` Bryan Wu
2012-12-04  8:11         ` Peter Ujfalusi
2012-12-04 17:34           ` Bryan Wu [this message]
2012-12-05 15:36             ` Peter Ujfalusi
2012-11-12 14:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] leds: leds-pwm: Preparing the driver for device tree support Peter Ujfalusi
2012-11-12 14:41 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] leds: leds-pwm: Add device tree bindings Peter Ujfalusi
2012-12-06 10:00   ` Grant Likely
2012-12-06 12:36     ` Peter Ujfalusi
2012-12-07 13:34       ` Grant Likely
2012-12-07 14:04         ` Peter Ujfalusi
2012-12-10 22:37           ` Grant Likely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAK5ve-K69=NqApFTFOZB7Z_KXcRLaWExzbkUhP=GeASMB7JYqw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=cooloney@gmail.com \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-leds@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
    --cc=rpurdie@rpsys.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).