linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
To: "Michal Suchánek" <msuchanek@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Nicolas Schier" <nicolas@fjasle.eu>,
	linux-modules@vger.kernel.org, "Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@suse.com>,
	"Lucas De Marchi" <lucas.de.marchi@gmail.com>,
	"Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>,
	"Jiri Slaby" <jslaby@suse.com>,
	"Jan Engelhardt" <jengelh@inai.de>,
	"Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>,
	"Nick Desaulniers" <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rebased] kbuild: rpm-pkg: Fix build with non-default MODLIB
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 00:14:01 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQQMFUt4R1m_U8kBY5=BvxD_dMuE4MD4kpd48WK1E+AGA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231009140733.GV6241@kitsune.suse.cz>

On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 11:07 PM Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@suse.de> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 09:34:10PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 5:52 PM Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@suse.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 05:31:02PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 12:49 AM Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The default MODLIB value is composed of two variables and the hardcoded
> > > > > string '/lib/modules/'.
> > > > >
> > > > > MODLIB = $(INSTALL_MOD_PATH)/lib/modules/$(KERNELRELEASE)
> > > > >
> > > > > Defining this middle part as a variable was rejected on the basis that
> > > > > users can pass the whole MODLIB to make, such as
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > In other words, do you want to say
> > > >
> > > > "If defining this middle part as a variable had been accepted,
> > > > this patch would have been unneeded." ?
> > >
> > > If it were accepted I would not have to guess what the middle part is,
> > > and could use the variable that unambiguosly defines it instead.
> >
> >
> > How?
> >
> > scripts/package/kernel.spec hardcodes 'lib/modules'
> > in a couple of places.
> >
> > I am asking how to derive the module path.
>
> Not sure what you are asking here. The path is hardcoded, everywhere.
>
> The current Makefile has
>
> MODLIB  = $(INSTALL_MOD_PATH)/lib/modules/$(KERNELRELEASE)
>
> and there is no reliable way to learn what the middle part was after the
> fact - $(INSTALL_MOD_PATH) can be non-empty.
>
> The rejected patch was changing this to a variable, and also default to
> adjusting the content to what kmod exports in pkgconfig after applying a
> proposed patch to make this hardcoded part configurable:
>
> export KERNEL_MODULE_DIRECTORY := $(shell pkg-config --print-variables kmod 2>/dev/null | grep '^module_directory$$' >/dev/null && pkg-config --variable=module_directory kmod || echo /lib/modules)
>
> MODLIB  = $(INSTALL_MOD_PATH)$(KERNEL_MODULE_DIRECTORY)/$(KERNELRELEASE)
>
> It would be completely posible to only define the middle part as a
> variable that could then be used in rpm-pkg:
>
> export KERNEL_MODULE_DIRECTORY := /lib/modules
>
> MODLIB  = $(INSTALL_MOD_PATH)$(KERNEL_MODULE_DIRECTORY)/$(KERNELRELEASE)
>
> Thanks
>
> Michal
>
>


Let me add more context to my question.


I am interested in the timing when
'pkg-config --print-variables kmod | grep module_directory'
is executed.



1.  Build a SRPM on machine A

2.  Copy the SRPM from machine A to machine B

3.  Run rpmbuild on machine B to build the SRPM into a RPM

4.  Copy the RPM from machine B to machine C

5.  Install the RPM to machine C


Of course, we are most interested in the module path
of machine C, but it is difficult/impossible to
guess it at the time of building.

We can assume machine B == machine C.

We are the second most interested in the module
path on machine B.

The module path of machine A is not important.


So, I am asking where you would inject
'pkg-config --print-variables kmod | grep module_directory'.


-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-09 15:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-05 15:07 [PATCH rebased] kbuild: rpm-pkg: Fix build with non-default MODLIB Michal Suchanek
2023-10-06 16:58 ` Nathan Chancellor
2023-10-09  8:31 ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-10-09  8:52   ` Michal Suchánek
2023-10-09 12:34     ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-10-09 14:07       ` Michal Suchánek
2023-10-09 15:14         ` Masahiro Yamada [this message]
2023-10-09 16:01           ` Jan Engelhardt
2023-10-10 10:15           ` Michal Suchánek
2023-10-17 10:15             ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-10-17 10:44               ` Michal Suchánek
2023-10-17 12:05                 ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-10-17 12:27                   ` Michal Suchánek
2023-10-17 14:46                     ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-10-17 15:10                       ` Michal Suchánek
2023-10-18  1:12                         ` Jan Engelhardt
2023-11-10 17:44                           ` Michal Suchánek
2023-11-10 17:57                             ` Jan Engelhardt
2023-12-06 19:47                       ` [PATCH v6 1/2] depmod: Handle installing modules under a different directory Michal Suchanek
2023-12-10 18:43                         ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-12-10 18:51                           ` Woody Suwalski
2023-12-10 21:07                           ` Michal Suchánek
2023-12-11  4:29                             ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-12-12 13:03                               ` Michal Suchánek
2023-12-18 14:05                                 ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-12-06 19:47                       ` [PATCH v6 2/2] kbuild: rpm-pkg: Fix build with non-default MODLIB Michal Suchanek
2023-12-10 18:44                         ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-12-10 21:08                           ` Michal Suchánek
2023-12-11  4:33                             ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-12-12 13:12                               ` Michal Suchánek
2023-12-18 14:16                                 ` Masahiro Yamada

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAK7LNAQQMFUt4R1m_U8kBY5=BvxD_dMuE4MD4kpd48WK1E+AGA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=jengelh@inai.de \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lucas.de.marchi@gmail.com \
    --cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
    --cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=nicolas@fjasle.eu \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).