From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752466AbdKNDwY (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2017 22:52:24 -0500 Received: from conssluserg-02.nifty.com ([210.131.2.81]:36321 "EHLO conssluserg-02.nifty.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750888AbdKNDwT (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2017 22:52:19 -0500 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-02.nifty.com vAE3pui1009019 X-Nifty-SrcIP: [209.85.220.178] X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYUfmbz+l2PNbiKvMyJxwF3/cCVW0uJ6UFmsIaN6Bl/IZtZMgks/8dUlXjWwqnqE5U6JPbBAnqGMkyuImyInXU= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1510210850-28866-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> From: Masahiro Yamada Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 12:51:15 +0900 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] coccinelle: fix parallel build with CHECK=scripts/coccicheck To: Julia Lawall Cc: Linux Kbuild mailing list , cocci@systeme.lip6.fr, Nicolas Palix , Gilles Muller , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Michal Marek Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Julia, 2017-11-14 1:45 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall : > > > On Tue, 14 Nov 2017, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > >> Hi Julia, >> >> >> 2017-11-14 0:30 GMT+09:00 Julia Lawall : >> > >> > >> > On Thu, 9 Nov 2017, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >> > >> >> The command "make -j8 C=1 CHECK=scripts/coccicheck" produces lots of >> >> "coccicheck failed" error messages. >> >> >> >> I do not know the coccinelle internals, but I guess --jobs does not >> >> work well if spatch is invoked from Make running in parallel. >> >> Disable --jobs in this case. >> > >> > Why is this change under: >> > >> > if [ "$C" = "1" -o "$C" = "2" ]; >> > >> > The coccicheck failed messages come also if one runs Coccinelle on the >> > entire kernel. >> >> As far as I tested, "coccicheck failed" error only happens >> when ONLINE=1. >> >> >> make -j8 C=1 CHECK=scripts/coccicheck COCCI=scripts/coccinelle/misc/bugon.cocci >> >> emits lots of errors. >> >> >> make -j8 coccicheck COCCI=scripts/coccinelle/misc/bugon.cocci >> >> is fine. >> >> >> Have you tested it? >> Do you mean you got a different result from mine? > > I agree with your results, with respect to the number of errors. > > julia > So, what shall we do? If you do not like to fix it (or you can fix coccinelle itself), I can take back this patch. I am not a coccinelle developer, so setting USE_JOBS="no" is the best I can do. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada