From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4638EC43441 for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 16:28:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ECEB20825 for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 16:28:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nifty.com header.i=@nifty.com header.b="jEEaBwSC" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0ECEB20825 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=socionext.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728887AbeKJCJf (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2018 21:09:35 -0500 Received: from conssluserg-03.nifty.com ([210.131.2.82]:33259 "EHLO conssluserg-03.nifty.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727955AbeKJCJf (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2018 21:09:35 -0500 Received: from mail-vs1-f46.google.com (mail-vs1-f46.google.com [209.85.217.46]) (authenticated) by conssluserg-03.nifty.com with ESMTP id wA9GS5sN018058; Sat, 10 Nov 2018 01:28:06 +0900 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 conssluserg-03.nifty.com wA9GS5sN018058 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nifty.com; s=dec2015msa; t=1541780886; bh=iBHJlD26G8IQ/Tpcn+xbn58aF33WVcfgE+SRD629VqY=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=jEEaBwSCF5SlYLvQuFeuLVbATHxkfNoZZIrIWoNX9A4GFFzBe5viwRIXqkPRSaelh 4Rbd+ka0BHJf1XQbPdxW8P4nzmert7HDhWmojY5VFptssCNHx2yHnNT3e/4owjQT5R Aa+Sfe9lYmjVa4idJu0PtyX4obxZtm9GCd/UvSycygWo8Dc0kmtYAKmJ/A9keHygoc BuhF11mc9zR5xwbtexwIHIRJPaEKg0WOWwLBe9Qo1cE696PKBbEcvA9iV3+Xs7Huy8 5kykHCgxREX4NvZucvg+mPe9NPEt5gVhaaCJQiDpSEC+/W4I+8mAMS5HrayDX9yOw3 FTTH2NQA3KRnQ== X-Nifty-SrcIP: [209.85.217.46] Received: by mail-vs1-f46.google.com with SMTP id p74so1378247vsc.0; Fri, 09 Nov 2018 08:28:06 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJFRgTUpzsCm6GCtdHyo9Jx5H8WhvEi+pFdAtahErMgh7n8rgtH 7SoPE0i5q5DFpzieiLzJozYNJgO7wSq6wb/3SA8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5cCrBM6FJEIcC36UW/emOG9a0+sPMQZSHfXtN1p1wdpU8W59Xq5gbZ2oqrHFF5HI3k9DRsYSGiLZR5jeCtcOSk= X-Received: by 2002:a67:5f03:: with SMTP id t3mr4135836vsb.155.1541780884990; Fri, 09 Nov 2018 08:28:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181028130945.23581-1-changbin.du@gmail.com> <20181028130945.23581-2-changbin.du@gmail.com> <20181028140911.21d49629@vmware.local.home> <20181102112728.GC14602@zn.tnic> In-Reply-To: <20181102112728.GC14602@zn.tnic> From: Masahiro Yamada Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2018 01:27:29 +0900 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] x86/mm: declare check_la57_support() as inline To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Steven Rostedt , Changbin Du , Michal Marek , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Russell King , Andrew Morton , Greg Kroah-Hartman , X86 ML , Linux Kbuild mailing list , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arm-kernel , linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, Robin Murphy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 8:28 PM Borislav Petkov wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 10:04:46PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 3:09 AM Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, 28 Oct 2018 13:09:42 +0000 > > > Changbin Du wrote: > > > > > > > The level4_kernel_pgt is only defined when X86_5LEVEL is enabled. > > > > So declare check_la57_support() as inline to make sure the code > > > > referring to level4_kernel_pgt is optimized out. This is a preparation > > > > for CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_DEBUGGING. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Changbin Du > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) > > > > > > -- Steve > > > > > > > Applied to linux-kbuild. > > Next time, before you route a patch through your tree, please get an x86 > maintainer's ACK first. I changed my mind, and did not include this in my previous pull request because this series is causing many warnings. Now, it is aiming for v5.0-rc1 So, it is not too late. If x86 maintainers issue Acked-by, I am happy to add it. > Thx. > > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada