linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
	Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>,
	sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sparc,x86: vdso: remove meaningless undefining CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 14:57:20 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAQuOF-DcA7v3Uy-7hdVeT5hDuatGg6FY9TgG10T3OBr0w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNARHBfp=gkVO9q3pC9o_w9PgNW=5AP95s1MR1tHLJV=0fg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 4:20 PM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Ping.
> Could you pick up this series?
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 8:08 PM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > The code, #undef CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING, is not working as expected
> > because <linux/compiler_types.h> is parsed before vclock_gettime.c
> > since 28128c61e08e ("kconfig.h: Include compiler types to avoid missed
> > struct attributes").
> >
> > Since then, <linux/compiler_types.h> is included really early by
> > using the '-include' option. So, you cannot negate the decision of
> > <linux/compiler_types.h> in this way.
> >
> > You can confirm it by checking the pre-processed code, like this:
> >
> >   $ make arch/x86/entry/vdso/vdso32/vclock_gettime.i
> >
> > There is no difference with/without CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE.
> >
> > It is about two years since 28128c61e08e. Nobody has reported a
> > problem (or, nobody has even noticed the fact that this code is not
> > working).
> >
> > It is ugly and unreliable to attempt to undefine a CONFIG option from
> > C files, and anyway the inlining heuristic is up to the compiler.
> >
> > Just remove the broken code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
> > Acked-by: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>



I think adding the patch author to Cc:
is strange.



The footer of 6290b47e9aa282c11f38390931b06402c553dbc4
looks like this.


    Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220110807.32534-1-masahiroy@kernel.org
    Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
    Acked-by: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
    Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
    Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
    Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
    Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
    Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
    Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
    Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
    Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
    Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
    Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>



"Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>"
is unneeded since I am the author.



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

      reply	other threads:[~2020-04-03  5:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-20 11:08 [PATCH v2 1/2] sparc,x86: vdso: remove meaningless undefining CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING Masahiro Yamada
2020-02-20 11:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] compiler: Remove CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING entirely Masahiro Yamada
2020-02-20 17:42   ` Nathan Chancellor
2020-02-20 17:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sparc,x86: vdso: remove meaningless undefining CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING Nathan Chancellor
2020-03-19  7:20 ` Masahiro Yamada
2020-04-03  5:57   ` Masahiro Yamada [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAK7LNAQuOF-DcA7v3Uy-7hdVeT5hDuatGg6FY9TgG10T3OBr0w@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).