linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bitfield: avoid gcc-8 -Wint-in-bool-context warning
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2018 08:57:34 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNASVE-vZhGyAsWg8YmPb8P-sucwPVOUt5qsfVwZQuHg9gw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180813220950.194841-1-arnd@arndb.de>

2018-08-14 7:09 GMT+09:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>:
> Passing an enum into FIELD_GET() produces a long but harmless warning on
> newer compilers:
>
>                  from include/linux/linkage.h:7,
>                  from include/linux/kernel.h:7,
>                  from include/linux/skbuff.h:17,
>                  from include/linux/if_ether.h:23,
>                  from include/linux/etherdevice.h:25,
>                  from drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rxmq.c:63:
> drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rxmq.c: In function 'iwl_mvm_rx_mpdu_mq':
> include/linux/bitfield.h:56:20: error: enum constant in boolean context [-Werror=int-in-bool-context]
>    BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(!(_mask), _pfx "mask is zero"); \
>                     ^
> ...
> include/linux/bitfield.h:103:3: note: in expansion of macro '__BF_FIELD_CHECK'
>    __BF_FIELD_CHECK(_mask, _reg, 0U, "FIELD_GET: "); \
>    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rxmq.c:1025:21: note: in expansion of macro 'FIELD_GET'
>     le16_encode_bits(FIELD_GET(IWL_RX_HE_PHY_SIBG_SYM_OR_USER_NUM_MASK,


How about fixing the root cause
in drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/api/rx.h ?


#define IWL_RX_HE_PHY_SIBG_SYM_OR_USER_NUM_MASK   0x1e00000000ULL


enum iwl_rx_he_phy looks really strange.



Passing enum to FIELD_GET is odd,
so I prefer keeping this warned.



> The problem here is that the caller has no idea how the macro gets
> expanding, leading to a false-positive. It can be trivially avoided
> by doing a comparison against zero.
>
> This only recently started appearing as the iwlwifi driver was patched
> to use FIELD_GET.
>
> Fixes: 514c30696fbc ("iwlwifi: add support for IEEE802.11ax")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
>  include/linux/bitfield.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bitfield.h b/include/linux/bitfield.h
> index 65a6981eef7b..3f1ef4450a7c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bitfield.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bitfield.h
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
>         ({                                                              \
>                 BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(!__builtin_constant_p(_mask),          \
>                                  _pfx "mask is not constant");          \
> -               BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(!(_mask), _pfx "mask is zero");        \
> +               BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG((_mask) == 0, _pfx "mask is zero");    \
>                 BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(__builtin_constant_p(_val) ?           \
>                                  ~((_mask) >> __bf_shf(_mask)) & (_val) : 0, \
>                                  _pfx "value too large for the field"); \
> --
> 2.18.0
>



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-13 23:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-13 22:09 [PATCH] bitfield: avoid gcc-8 -Wint-in-bool-context warning Arnd Bergmann
2018-08-13 23:57 ` Masahiro Yamada [this message]
2018-08-14  7:56   ` Johannes Berg
2018-08-14  8:43     ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-08-14  9:31     ` Masahiro Yamada
2018-08-14 10:06     ` David Laight
2018-08-14 11:08       ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-08-14 11:10         ` Johannes Berg
2018-08-14 13:09         ` David Laight
2018-08-14 23:11 ` Andrew Morton
2018-08-14 23:13   ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAK7LNASVE-vZhGyAsWg8YmPb8P-sucwPVOUt5qsfVwZQuHg9gw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).