From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
To: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Makefile: Remove '--gcc-toolchain' flag
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 00:36:11 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNATADzwnJt8vBQADGJjGe8jscRTAwvrLNc8AFgZ9SoWDUQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+icZUVRyEGnLnRBiZjmZqmvCLkR8AZR8tihho83Lrr_F9A2BA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 1:42 AM Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 5:22 PM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 5:59 AM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > This flag was originally added to allow clang to find the GNU cross
> > > tools in commit 785f11aa595b ("kbuild: Add better clang cross build
> > > support"). This flag was not enough to find the tools at times so
> > > '--prefix' was added to the list in commit ef8c4ed9db80 ("kbuild: allow
> > > to use GCC toolchain not in Clang search path") and improved upon in
> > > commit ca9b31f6bb9c ("Makefile: Fix GCC_TOOLCHAIN_DIR prefix for Clang
> > > cross compilation"). Now that '--prefix' specifies a full path and
> > > prefix, '--gcc-toolchain' serves no purpose because the kernel builds
> > > with '-nostdinc' and '-nostdlib'.
> > >
> > > This has been verified with self compiled LLVM 10.0.1 and LLVM 13.0.0 as
> > > well as a distribution version of LLVM 11.1.0 without binutils in the
> > > LLVM toolchain locations.
> > >
> > > Link: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97902
> > > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > v1 -> v2:
> > >
> > > * Improve commit message (add history behind flag and link to Fangrui's
> > > documentation improvement).
> >
> >
> > Both applied to linux-kbuild. Thanks.
> >
>
> Sorry for being pedantic: This misses my Tested-by#s (see [1]).
>
> Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> # LLVM/Clang v13-git
>
> AFAICS v2 changes some comments in the commit only but not code?
For 1/2, yes. The difference is only comments.
For 2/2, the code was changed.
Actually, v1 was wrong.
That is why the tags were dropped.
I will re-add the tags to 1/2
since there is no code diff.
If you re-test 2/2, I will add your tag again.
> - Sedat -
>
> [1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=161480031518629&w=2
> [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/masahiroy/linux-kbuild.git/commit/?h=kbuild&id=d4aa405bc9cd506532f075456645716cdd1739c1
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > I did not carry tags forward so that people could re-review and test.
> > >
> > > Makefile | 4 ----
> > > 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> > > index 31dcdb3d61fa..182e93d91198 100644
> > > --- a/Makefile
> > > +++ b/Makefile
> > > @@ -568,10 +568,6 @@ ifneq ($(CROSS_COMPILE),)
> > > CLANG_FLAGS += --target=$(notdir $(CROSS_COMPILE:%-=%))
> > > GCC_TOOLCHAIN_DIR := $(dir $(shell which $(CROSS_COMPILE)elfedit))
> > > CLANG_FLAGS += --prefix=$(GCC_TOOLCHAIN_DIR)$(notdir $(CROSS_COMPILE))
> > > -GCC_TOOLCHAIN := $(realpath $(GCC_TOOLCHAIN_DIR)/..)
> > > -endif
> > > -ifneq ($(GCC_TOOLCHAIN),)
> > > -CLANG_FLAGS += --gcc-toolchain=$(GCC_TOOLCHAIN)
> > > endif
> > > ifneq ($(LLVM_IAS),1)
> > > CLANG_FLAGS += -no-integrated-as
> > >
> > > base-commit: a38fd8748464831584a19438cbb3082b5a2dab15
> > > --
> > > 2.31.0.rc1
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards
> > Masahiro Yamada
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-16 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-02 21:06 [PATCH 1/2] Makefile: Remove '--gcc-toolchain' flag Nathan Chancellor
2021-03-02 21:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] Makefile: Only specify '--prefix=' when building with clang + GNU as Nathan Chancellor
2021-03-02 22:02 ` Fangrui Song
2021-03-02 22:09 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-03-02 22:40 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-03-09 19:55 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-03-09 19:58 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-09-29 17:26 ` kernel test robot
2021-09-29 19:32 ` kernel test robot
2021-03-02 21:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] Makefile: Remove '--gcc-toolchain' flag Fangrui Song
2021-03-03 8:33 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-03-02 22:33 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-03-03 3:25 ` Sedat Dilek
2021-03-03 14:22 ` Sedat Dilek
2021-03-09 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 " Nathan Chancellor
2021-03-09 20:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] Makefile: Only specify '--prefix=' when building with clang + GNU as Nathan Chancellor
2021-03-09 21:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] Makefile: Remove '--gcc-toolchain' flag Fangrui Song
2021-03-15 16:21 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-03-15 16:41 ` Sedat Dilek
2021-03-16 15:36 ` Masahiro Yamada [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAK7LNATADzwnJt8vBQADGJjGe8jscRTAwvrLNc8AFgZ9SoWDUQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maskray@google.com \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).