Re: [PATCH v2 06/13] kbuild: reuse $(cmd_objtool) for cmd_cc_lto_link_modules

From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/13] kbuild: reuse $(cmd_objtool) for cmd_cc_lto_link_modules
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 09:39:14 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNATkducKiw8==u4477JGfyb5vnvbp2gM2s9ndZ_8owXfeg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202108311034.D4B1410@keescook>

On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 2:35 AM Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 04:39:57PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > For CONFIG_LTO_CLANG=y, the objtool processing is not possible at the
> > compilation, hence postponed by the link time.
> >
> > Reuse $(cmd_objtool) for CONFIG_LTO_CLANG=y by defining objtool-enabled
> > properly.
> >
> > For CONFIG_LTO_CLANG=y:
> >
> >   objtool-enabled is off for %.o compilation
> >   objtool-enabled is on  for %.lto link
> >
> > For CONFIG_LTO_CLANG=n:
> >
> >   objtool-enabled is on for %.o compilation
> >       (but, it depends on OBJECT_FILE_NON_STANDARD)
> >
> > Set part-of-module := y for %.lto.o to avoid repeating --module.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >
> >  scripts/Makefile.build | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
> >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.build b/scripts/Makefile.build
> > index 21b55f37a23f..afc906cd7256 100644
> > --- a/scripts/Makefile.build
> > +++ b/scripts/Makefile.build
> > @@ -236,20 +236,26 @@ objtool_args =                                                          \
> >       $(if $(CONFIG_X86_SMAP), --uaccess)                             \
> >       $(if $(CONFIG_FTRACE_MCOUNT_USE_OBJTOOL), --mcount)
> >
> > -ifndef CONFIG_LTO_CLANG
> > +cmd_objtool = $(if $(objtool-enabled), ; $(objtool) $(objtool_args) $@)
> > +cmd_gen_objtooldep = $(if $(objtool-enabled), { echo ; echo '$@: $$(wildcard $(objtool))' ; } >> $(dot-target).cmd)
> > +
> > +endif # CONFIG_STACK_VALIDATION
> > +
> > +ifdef CONFIG_LTO_CLANG
> > +
> > +# Skip objtool for LLVM bitcode
> > +$(obj)/%o: objtool-enabled :=
>
> Is this intentionally "%o" instead of "%.o"?

Good catch.

No, it is not intentional.

I will fix "%o" to "%.o"

> (And it later overridden by the "%.lto.o" rule?

No, opposite.

While building %.lto.o, we want to set objtool-enabled.
But, we want to cancel it for %.o

-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada