Hi Helge, On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 7:50 AM Helge Deller wrote: > > On 6/1/21 12:21 PM, Meelis Roos wrote: > > Upstream Linux git fails to compile on gentoo hppa - .config below. > > I have 2 gcc-s as always: > > $ gcc-config -l > > [1] hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu-9.3.0 > > [2] hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu-10.2.0 * > > > > [3] hppa64-unknown-linux-gnu-10.2.0 * > > > I see the same issue too, but only when compiling natively on a parisc machine. > Cross-compiling on a x86 box works nicely. > > First I thought it's a problem with setting the "cross_compiling" flag in ./Makefile. > But that's not sufficient. > > On a x86 machine (which builds fine) I get > SRCARCH=parisc SUBARCH=x86 UTS_MACHINE=parisc > The arch/parisc/kernel/asm-offsets.c file gets preprocessed via: > hppa64-linux-gnu-gcc > > On a native 32bit parisc machine I have: > SRCARCH=parisc SUBARCH=parisc UTS_MACHINE=parisc > Here the arch/parisc/kernel/asm-offsets.c file gets preprocessed via: > gcc > Instead here the native hppa64-linux-gnu-gcc (cross compiler) should have been used too, since > we build a 64-bit hppa kernel (CONFIG_64BIT is set). > Note, on hppa we don't have an "-m64" compiler flag as on x86. I see. hppa is not a bi-arch compiler, in other words, http- and hppa64- are separate compilers. > > Mashahiro, do you maybe have an idea what gets wrong here, or which > patch has changed the behaviour how the asm-offsets.c file gets preprocessed? Presumably, commit 23243c1ace9fb4eae2f75e0fe0ece8e3219fb4f3 Prior to that commit, arch/parisc/Makefile was like this: ifneq ($(SUBARCH),$(UTS_MACHINE)) ifeq ($(CROSS_COMPILE),) ... Now I understand why arch/parisc/Makefile was written this way. Reverting the change in arch/parisc/Makefile will restore the original behavior. But, please keep in mind that there is an issue remaining. Please see this code: ifdef CONFIG_64BIT UTS_MACHINE := parisc64 CHECKFLAGS += -D__LP64__=1 CC_ARCHES = hppa64 LD_BFD := elf64-hppa-linux else # 32-bit CC_ARCHES = hppa hppa2.0 hppa1.1 LD_BFD := elf32-hppa-linux endif UTS_MACHINE is determined by CONFIG_64BIT. CONFIG_64BIT is defined only after Kconfig is finished. When you are trying to configure the .config, CONFIG_64BIT is not defined yet. So UTS_MACHINE is always 'parisc'. As you know, Kconfig files now have a bunch of 'cc-option' syntax to check the compiler capability in Kconfig time. Hence, you need to provide a proper compiler in Kconfig time too. When you build a 64-bit parisc kernel on a 32-bit parisc machine, Kconfig is passed with CC=gcc since SUBARCH==UTS_MACHINE==parisc. After Kconfig, CROSS_COMPILE=hppa64-* is set, and the kernel is built by CC=hppa64-*-gcc. So, Kconfig evaluated a compiletely different compiler. This is pointless. There are some options [option 1] revert the parisc bit of 23243c1ace9fb4eae2f75e0fe0ece8e3219fb4f3 This will restore the functionality you may want, but as I said above, Kconfig is doing pointless things. [option 2] Stop using cc-cross-prefix, and pass CROSS_COMPILE explicitly. This is what many architectures including arm, arm64 do. You need to explicitly pass CROSS_COMPILE=aarch64-linux-gnu- etc. if you are cross-compiling arm64. [option 3] Introduce ARCH=parisc64. When you are building 64-bit kernel, you can pass ARCH=parisc64 A patch attached. (but not tested much) -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada