linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
	Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] making uapi/linux/elfcore.h useful again
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2018 21:55:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a03qF4+yGBNVLymrSRN7QjDGjnpduoPwnprwv+kfHZ0Cg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180914174528.GA35000@gmail.com>

On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 7:45 PM Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> * Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > - Move required data from the private x86 asm/elf.h file into
> >   a new uapi/asm/elf.h. Some other architectures already do that,
> >   but most of them do not. Before applying the patch, we have
> >   to do this for all architectures
>
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

Thanks,

> I suspect this wants to go through -mm, or do you want to carry it?

-mm is probably best. For now, I just want to see if there are any
concerns about this, and then I'd have to do the full version that
changes all architectures.

     Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-14 19:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-14 11:38 [PATCH] [RFC] making uapi/linux/elfcore.h useful again Arnd Bergmann
2018-09-14 17:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-09-14 19:55   ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2018-09-15 11:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-09-17 12:05 ` Joseph Myers
2018-09-18 14:21   ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAK8P3a03qF4+yGBNVLymrSRN7QjDGjnpduoPwnprwv+kfHZ0Cg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).