From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752092AbdKHLFv (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Nov 2017 06:05:51 -0500 Received: from mail-ot0-f194.google.com ([74.125.82.194]:43131 "EHLO mail-ot0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750818AbdKHLFt (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Nov 2017 06:05:49 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYxEGw+J/88I//Bjq+XN3QGMSokupCF/uXj5vsffLwqTJ1Fop2hnI4ur7O3CWlNN7Hj3qOk9Q6ua1J4Vf6xwG0= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3f79f75f-1b6a-3f7b-b0c0-f970f0fb6c12@arm.com> References: <1509720477-18936-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <1509720477-18936-21-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> <4588325.776kYim3Ci@aspire.rjw.lan> <3f79f75f-1b6a-3f7b-b0c0-f970f0fb6c12@arm.com> From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 12:05:48 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: gfLFp5TXdzhiYNa9_joYf7rPwQk Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 20/20] cpufreq: scmi: add support for fast frequency switching To: Sudeep Holla Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , ALKML , LKML , DTML , Roy Franz , Harb Abdulhamid , Nishanth Menon , Loc Ho , Ryan Harkin , Jassi Brar , Viresh Kumar , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > On 08/11/17 00:24, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Friday, November 3, 2017 3:47:57 PM CET Sudeep Holla wrote: >>> The cpufreq core provides option for drivers to implement fast_switch >>> callback which is invoked for frequency switching from interrupt context. >>> >>> This patch adds support for fast_switch callback in SCMI cpufreq driver >>> by making use of polling based SCMI transfer. It also sets the flag >>> fast_switch_possible. >>> >>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" >>> Cc: Viresh Kumar >>> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org >>> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla >> >> I'm assuming that this material will go in along with the rest of the series >> through a different tree. >> > > Indeed, I will ask ARM-SoC guys to take it via their tree when ready. I > assume you are fine with that, please provide ack if that's still the case. Yes, that makes sense. Arnd