From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BED4C43387 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:43:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 003ED2064C for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:43:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729625AbfAJWnx (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jan 2019 17:43:53 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-f193.google.com ([209.85.160.193]:36665 "EHLO mail-qt1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727721AbfAJWnv (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jan 2019 17:43:51 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-f193.google.com with SMTP id t13so15886670qtn.3; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 14:43:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8BQxy77aw0o+DSOGQG1SQtIdLEpkaKMICEdNR1LQ13U=; b=ggAj9vAT5WGEP5ApMiqfssHwl/dQskyj+bcfmb5AyWMfmpvJhfuFkqioSyolrYc9TU gdqt7zFs0kD7jWxdbKppu/0pTxAnUVImUs9iDyCzknRrP0AxBYXc8kRInflA9zy3Z112 n1RP5F6pfwIDXh8n6ynSWC2mfGIkmy1/VHY59K7VDtLF5sFZObhPjYCa0CMcf2+AHn1V seXaixTmWE9NNv/IoaBeB8HOdGWPDjAZxpPNAXP+SxI6f7273l4H5iOnrX4it1yGlaLP ePVKxfucr2q4R0G3eUaOKDsmmEVPfsN6l6nisqAL+C8UaK0YtdyhCfY649wdgbhxpvo+ 3IvQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukdn5OtGQutjgGpwace7l1KpMatpHL+YqL6bOMj3FlnWQ18sYvDT GE9Q7M3RoUIJBOMwPbHumEHwkDQpDSjeJCDd+RQArg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6HaEyY/0zx6RGqFtKtlSPz+RZx+KrllRYiKjcCjzeA51uZ4VQUxl3HD7ARydoqD46n7kKW7Dhkol5Ir927zA4= X-Received: by 2002:ae9:d8c2:: with SMTP id u185mr10538686qkf.107.1547160230039; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 14:43:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190110162435.309262-1-arnd@arndb.de> In-Reply-To: From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 23:43:32 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] arch: synchronize syscall tables in preparation for y2038 To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: y2038 Mailman List , Linux API , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Ivan Kokshaysky , Matt Turner , Russell King , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Tony Luck , Fenghua Yu , Michal Simek , Paul Burton , Helge Deller , Michael Ellerman , Martin Schwidefsky , Heiko Carstens , Rich Felker , "David S. Miller" , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , "the arch/x86 maintainers" , Max Filippov , Firoz Khan , "Eric W. Biederman" , Deepa Dinamani , Dominik Brodowski , Andrew Morton , Davidlohr Bueso , alpha , Linux ARM , "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , linux-m68k , linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Parisc List , linuxppc-dev , linux-s390 , Linux-sh list , sparclinux Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 7:11 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 6:06 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:59 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:26 PM Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > The system call tables have diverged a bit over the years, and a number > > > > of the recent additions never made it into all architectures, for one > > > > reason or another. > > > > > > > > This is an attempt to clean it up as far as we can without breaking > > > > compatibility, doing a number of steps: > > > > > > Thanks a lot! > > > > > > > - Add system calls that have not yet been integrated into all > > > > architectures but that we definitely want there. > > > > > > It looks like you missed wiring up io_pgetevents() on m68k. > > > Is that intentional? > > > > Yes, I thought I had described that somewhere but maybe I > > forgot: semtimedop() and io_pgetevents() get replaced with > > time64 versions in the follow-up, so I only added them in > > 64-bit architectures. If you think we should have both > > io_pgetevents() and io_pgetevents_time32() on all 32-bit > > architectures, I can add that as well. > > Thanks, sounds fine to me. Just to be sure, you mean it's fine to not add it, not that we should add it? Arnd