From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org
Subject: Re: spinlock.c:306:9: error: implicit declaration of function '__raw_write_lock_nested'
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 11:43:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a08wiu4uGrCvh+1Ezm2q2ta=DJMoZ1MFhUgjaMYJ0Be6A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8767803d-57b9-698c-ca27-d47e7117758d@landley.net>
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 11:01 AM Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> wrote:
> On 11/23/21 7:19 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > These happen with any compiler version, someone needs to write the correct
> > entry code for clone3 and hook up futex_waitv().
>
> I did a naieve "add them both to the .tbl" patch and the result booted to a
> shell prompt, but that doesn't mean much. What arch-specific entry code does
> clone3 need here? The SYSCALL_DEFINE2(clone3) in kernel/fork.c seems reasonably
> straightforward? (Unlike the #ifdef stack around the previous clone...)
I forget the exact issue, but I can see that 4 out of the 13
architectures that set
__ARCH_WANT_SYS_CLONE3 provide a custom version: arc, m68k,
mips and parisc. Have a look at what those do to see if you need the same
changes.
> >> include/linux/sh_intc.h:100:63: warning: division 'sizeof (void *) / sizeof (void)' does not compute the number of array elements
> >
> > These are old bugs, they show up in any kernel version with gcc-8 or higher.
>
> I looked at trying to fix that but it seems to be a compiler bug. Gcc is warning
> about an ? : else case that's dead code eliminated. It's already GOT a test
> protecting it from being evaluated...
I wouldn't call it a bug in the compiler, as there is no definite
correct ordering
between dead-code-elimination and warning generation. IIRC I fixed a bunch
of these on other architectures, and those did turn out to be actual code issues
that would go unnoticed otherwise.
> >> fs/mpage.c:336:1: warning: the frame size of 1092 bytes is larger than
> >
> > I see these going back to gcc-6, it looks like this is caused by
> > CONFIG_PAGE_SIZE_64KB.
>
> In which case the stack size is going to be 64k as well?
No, the stack is still 4KB or 8KB, depending on CONFIG_4KSTACKS, it gets
allocated using
stack = kmem_cache_alloc_node(thread_stack_cache, THREADINFO_GFP, node);
from a THREAD_SIZE-sized naturally-aligned kmem cache in this case.
Using 1KB of stack space is definitely a red flag that something is going
wrong. This could be a bug in kernel code, in the compiler, or in the
combination of the two.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-24 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-23 11:38 spinlock.c:306:9: error: implicit declaration of function '__raw_write_lock_nested' Naresh Kamboju
2021-11-23 13:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-11-23 14:48 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-11-23 14:50 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-11-23 16:07 ` [PATCH] locking: Fixup write_lock_nested() implementation Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-11-23 17:01 ` [PATCH v2] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2021-11-23 22:52 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-11-24 10:01 ` spinlock.c:306:9: error: implicit declaration of function '__raw_write_lock_nested' Rob Landley
2021-11-24 10:43 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2021-11-24 7:31 ` Rob Landley
2021-11-24 7:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-11-24 13:15 ` André Almeida
2021-11-24 14:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-11-24 13:21 ` [PATCH 1/1] futex: Wireup futex_waitv syscall André Almeida
2021-11-24 13:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-11-24 14:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-11-24 15:56 ` André Almeida
2021-11-24 23:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-24 17:23 ` Max Filippov
2021-11-24 23:07 ` Michael Ellerman
2021-11-24 23:38 ` spinlock.c:306:9: error: implicit declaration of function '__raw_write_lock_nested' Rob Landley
2021-11-25 7:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-11-25 12:10 ` Rob Landley
2021-11-26 23:51 ` Stafford Horne
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAK8P3a08wiu4uGrCvh+1Ezm2q2ta=DJMoZ1MFhUgjaMYJ0Be6A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).