From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D19C433FE for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 21:48:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3548D233A2 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 21:48:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2394814AbgLKVBJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Dec 2020 16:01:09 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:46578 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2394751AbgLKVAu (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Dec 2020 16:00:50 -0500 X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5322j4ttJklW+DSxqy+Hd8WKQNQcckFq0lP19zt92d1S1z6A6tUY CdMXowuzH33z9b53iHi2nwhvjj4a5uYg9L0n7js= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1607720409; bh=0OdAfHXVSmV4upgVK23rC2WbpmA/myKVM+LFlH0XlSQ=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=mpJYb+gNtdzZ6IlU8NXxiQGR6E4QaG75tYJQYVxDdFkWZw7S9r5DWhbVKQZJkN/wA Qmrbem+xtwznOPgGAYj0/HzaCuOUhs3rSSf6pAT/BY8yGk1/wqEelrw+DavY9DW0hR Ado57lSq5dCML+gxu+NYkcQQ0+341nPwL3TPT+0vHYjnvwOizrEM7jpeBLBkSwzJVu f9uArj5QA9M1PLW89R1FC3qvmpD68DxNrPdCPiC9E2OMIxV+8Gm+sTYkayQrKdNxWE x2xxxFFBb2K8+TaejDLAd+LIrmte6l/tfX/602H6grBPTJHfdaqL7zDaURzt85n/uw PfiEF+8ekQjDA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwiJpzQkQ22vcNutFE60niWIjCFOoaLOg3iwr+QhczmEN98RjDpRUwCX/UyGEjItEc0onPxtrvuVAJDsEytYT4= X-Received: by 2002:aca:418b:: with SMTP id o133mr10373990oia.67.1607720408751; Fri, 11 Dec 2020 13:00:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20201211163749.31956-1-yonatanlinik@gmail.com> <20201211163749.31956-2-yonatanlinik@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20201211163749.31956-2-yonatanlinik@gmail.com> From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 21:59:51 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: Fix use of proc_fs To: Yonatan Linik Cc: David Miller , Jakub Kicinski , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , Andrii Nakryiko , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Willem de Bruijn , john.ogness@linutronix.de, Arnd Bergmann , Mao Wenan , Colin Ian King , orcohen@paloaltonetworks.com, Networking , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , bpf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 5:37 PM Yonatan Linik wrote: > index 2b33e977a905..031f2b593720 100644 > --- a/net/packet/af_packet.c > +++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c > @@ -4612,9 +4612,11 @@ static int __net_init packet_net_init(struct net *net) > mutex_init(&net->packet.sklist_lock); > INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&net->packet.sklist); > > +#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS > if (!proc_create_net("packet", 0, net->proc_net, &packet_seq_ops, > sizeof(struct seq_net_private))) > return -ENOMEM; > +#endif /* CONFIG_PROC_FS */ > Another option would be to just ignore the return code here and continue without a procfs file, regardless of whether procfs is enabled or not. Arnd