From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD98CC10F11 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 18:57:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B761B2077C for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 18:57:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726588AbfDJS5j (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:57:39 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-f194.google.com ([209.85.160.194]:36604 "EHLO mail-qt1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725981AbfDJS5i (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:57:38 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-f194.google.com with SMTP id s15so4202513qtn.3; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:57:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=c7pJEAL+FpS1hEYkJeywmp4z9jpwm432Los5WBYEtHI=; b=LLaMY5XppX2Qa5lby6QWeljF/IbMJwHG1iiRmsUky8bVeAMX+FTns/ldGJ8TXGwZe0 2QR2EOuNLDMFB+OdIi1N1ZgbtmrjZOEHM83FR2kqiiPJxa7+ciOidK3OKDiYE23PPZIc 1tU2VPtYoBf7MbZolAbcM1mTP9TNi0GFdYQwYfndzJ/pu6SeAyhRv1BkgEEFb9uFXEjj LM4wbjJbJERaBZ+c4o8vqjmu4PjlEhhG9mXVccwdmd7aPekTAnIGXjjz45WvKeJzzy/n W6cw7MnEnl6PE6cXvOAiea4/qmgL0gezGDeBUHvSPnaLUKmbnP46qd85CH1FZRYpr55G a30g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVf9aPTR7C6dgO0R5HliOTalMt4DJzb29bU50J5YOJZpx+5Lo0E njB6vwz/2vVNEQIijZkbrR5/ooIgLetxxOhSYO8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxG18t+7PgEK25vAm9gJmpIipBr/KW8D4w4fXr/fhW7YRKXN/bcohuIYkP7l1UIQNzwUiCB7CNbRVQjUHJIu4w= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:1a0b:: with SMTP id v11mr39108131qtj.171.1554922657884; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:57:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190408212648.2407234-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20190408212648.2407234-5-arnd@arndb.de> <8875e0b6-00b4-884d-fd6a-a5a144543559@linux.ibm.com> <20190410175946.0e6d2b00@mschwideX1> In-Reply-To: <20190410175946.0e6d2b00@mschwideX1> From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 20:57:21 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/12] s390: zcrypt: initialize variables before_use To: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: Harald Freudenberger , Heiko Carstens , clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, Nick Desaulniers , Nathan Chancellor , linux-s390 , Ingo Franzki , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 5:59 PM Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 11:54:30 +0200 Harald Freudenberger wrote: > > On 08.04.19 23:26, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > } > > Thanks Arnd, but as Nathan already wrote, I'd prefer to have the > > variable initialized with 0 instead of -1. > > If you agree with this, I'll rewrite the patch and apply it to our > > internal git and it will appear at kernel org with the next s390 code merge then. > > Do we agreement on func_coed=0 for this one ? Yes, I think that was the consensus. Arnd