From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FA25C433E0 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 08:12:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB1C52313A for ; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 08:12:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730358AbhATIMD (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2021 03:12:03 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:53466 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730330AbhATIJv (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Jan 2021 03:09:51 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1AC3423158; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 08:09:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1611130150; bh=/HfBzBSANlICHrP1a1WpTnfk5fzRQn9cCG7zDTD+eW4=; h=References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:Subject:To:Cc:From; b=krNfbDUiux3nXeyPVn7hWFleQ1PHX6PyV3LMaa26LG7zKROGj+0yQ6CPOHERxpHhw jMM+RDQIJ8naiklv/9gbGTNyHbR1yaWxAUQDJn//YK4fpjbVQW7WLdJiSnydH9GphX KZJ6uoBHI1suLLjQ8kKqXRdEutvPhR1QUDBLEsJ+zK/Xx3PG1OLPrs2X5OiL14Of18 6OwW6kSsnKNVg47ftLC0sKTIB5FwT31gkn/o5jze7bbXwkySSaVNwfnZ4mHu11pnWV EhE9K2aeWF1P+zuTJ+RxjooNuSReyFh2a8vg7JnD8fldNGOMWKUSKj2W6+AUDI8KEr 7wL8gvV+U67yQ== Received: by mail-ot1-f49.google.com with SMTP id i30so9682145ota.6; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:09:10 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532hrcxL89tJwghTl5+hqhlUJpHvg339jmseA/Aw83JifjnrYhul VlVpJAbA9LBdJ76CtGFeqRl6wTdyWwEwEVktRg0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy263plUMjcPMTIVN3pL3Jkd6CPPS2dJO1OqpkFOp14dJ54PQ5qw8rErGyq4JKShXK4lfkGA6JHY5Swjy6e/k0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:139a:: with SMTP id d26mr6249681otq.305.1611130149279; Wed, 20 Jan 2021 00:09:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210118135426.17372-1-will@kernel.org> <20210119232952.GA2650682@ubuntu-m3-large-x86> In-Reply-To: <20210119232952.GA2650682@ubuntu-m3-large-x86> From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 09:08:52 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [STABLE BACKPORT 4.4.y, 4.9.y and 4.14.y] compiler.h: Raise minimum version of GCC to 5.1 for arm64 To: Nathan Chancellor Cc: Nick Desaulniers , Will Deacon , Greg KH , "# 3.4.x" , LKML , Russell King , Linus Torvalds , "Theodore Ts'o" , Florian Weimer , Peter Zijlstra , Catalin Marinas , Caroline Tice , Luis Lozano , Stephen Hines Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 12:29 AM Nathan Chancellor wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 02:15:43PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > > > Merging this from stable into "Android Common Kernel" trees that were > > built with AOSP GCC 4.9, I expect this to break some builds. Arnd, > > IIRC did you mention that AOSP GCC had picked up a fix? If so, did > > you verify that via disassembly, or gerrit patch file? The only information I had was the fact that the gcc bug tracker mentioned it being picked up into the Android gcc and gcc-linaro. I verified that it was present in gcc-linaro, but did not also check the Android sources. > If so, it looks like that patch was picked up in this commit. > > https://android.googlesource.com/toolchain/gcc/+/5ae0308a147ec3f6502fd321860524e634a647a6 Right. Arnd