From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753061AbdHBLNP (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Aug 2017 07:13:15 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f66.google.com ([209.85.218.66]:37424 "EHLO mail-oi0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752883AbdHBLNN (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Aug 2017 07:13:13 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170801235555.GA539@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> References: <20170801173746.6962444d@canb.auug.org.au> <20170801124204.GA457@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> <20170801235555.GA539@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> From: Arnd Bergmann Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 13:13:12 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: t9TPux4k7-Qy6FZdGvID8Pq6Ix4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 1 To: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Stephen Rothwell , Sergey Senozhatsky Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > On (08/01/17 15:28), Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> Does this fix it? I definitely got this part wrong as I see now, we must >> look up the 'tail' after calling __tty_buffer_request_room, not before. > > yes, it does. thanks! > > Tested-by: Sergey Senozhatsky Thanks for testing! I've now submitted that fix properly with a real changelog and your Tested-by tag. Arnd