linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] kexec: simplify compat_sys_kexec_load
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 16:05:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a27_z8zk6j5W4n+u3g2e90v-h+3AbaTZ6YjCQ0B7AbJaA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1bl982m8c.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>

On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 3:41 PM Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> wrote:
>
> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> writes:
>
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>KEXEC_ARCH_DEFAULT
> >
> > The compat version of sys_kexec_load() uses compat_alloc_user_space to
> > convert the user-provided arguments into the native format.
> >
> > Move the conversion into the regular implementation with
> > an in_compat_syscall() check to simplify it and avoid the
> > compat_alloc_user_space() call.
> >
> > compat_sys_kexec_load() now behaves the same as sys_kexec_load().
>
> Nacked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
>KEXEC_ARCH_DEFAULT
> The patch is wrong.
>
> The logic between the compat entry point and the ordinary entry point
> are by necessity different.   This unifies the logic and breaks the compat
> entry point.
>
> The fundamentally necessity is that the code being loaded needs to know
> which mode the kernel is running in so it can safely transition to the
> new kernel.
>
> Given that the two entry points fundamentally need different logic,
> and that difference was not preserved and the goal of this patchset
> was to unify that which fundamentally needs to be different.  I don't
> think this patch series makes any sense for kexec.

Sorry, I'm not following that explanation. Can you clarify what different
modes of the kernel you are referring to here, and how my patch
changes this?

The only difference I can see between the native and compat entry
points is the layout of the kexec_segment structure, and that is
obviously preserved by my patch.

         Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-18 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-17 20:33 [PATCH v3 0/4] compat: remove compat_alloc_user_space callers Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-17 20:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] kexec: simplify compat_sys_kexec_load Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18  3:57   ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-05-18  6:40     ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18  7:44       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18  6:38   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18  7:47     ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18 13:41   ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-05-18 14:05     ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2021-05-18 14:17       ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18 16:01         ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-05-18 22:45         ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-05-19  9:55           ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18 20:47   ` David Laight
2021-05-17 20:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] mm: simplify compat_sys_move_pages Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18  6:42   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-18 20:49   ` David Laight
2021-05-19 13:41     ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-17 20:33 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] mm: simplify compat numa syscalls Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18  6:52   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-17 20:33 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] compat: remove some compat entry points Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-18  6:55   ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-05-19 20:33   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-05-19 21:00     ` Arnd Bergmann
2021-05-20  9:21       ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAK8P3a27_z8zk6j5W4n+u3g2e90v-h+3AbaTZ6YjCQ0B7AbJaA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=arnd@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).