Re: [PATCH] syscalls: Fix file comments for syscalls implemented in kernel/sys.c

[Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>]

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 5:23 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 04:56:57PM -0500, Tal Zussman wrote:
> > The relevant syscalls were previously moved from kernel/timer.c to kernel/sys.c,
> > but the comments weren't updated to reflect this change.
> >
> > Fixing these comments messes up the alphabetical ordering of syscalls by
> > filename. This could be fixed by merging the two groups of kernel/sys.c syscalls,
> > but that would require reordering the syscalls and renumbering them to maintain
> > the numerical order in unistd.h.
>
> Lots of overly long lines in your commit log.
>
> As for the patch itself:  IMHO we should just remove the comments
> about the files as that information is completely irrelevant.

I noticed I already applied the patch last week to the asm-generic cleanups
branch, but forgot to send out the email about it.

I do agree the file names are rather useless, and I would apply a follow-up
patch to completely remove them as well. My real plan was to remove
the file itself and replace it with the parsable syscall.tbl format that we
use for all non-generic architectures, but I haven't gotten around to updating
the patch that Firoz Khan did a long time ago.

      arnd