From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it>,
Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org>, Hu Haowen <src.res@email.cn>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-doc-tw-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] Kbuild: move to -std=gnu11
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 19:24:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2To9St5=v6EHtJ-LBEp4-NOThPmO+qYeAfnxQPm2_Keg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7LNATVs-yRX4PnURkLv3fz3gAnuzG2GxZ2gdvmJX2g+0P-_w@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 6:02 PM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 7:32 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >
> > During a patch discussion, Linus brought up the option of changing
> > the C standard version from gnu89 to gnu99, which allows using variable
> > declaration inside of a for() loop. While the C99, C11 and later standards
> > introduce many other features, most of these are already available in
> > gnu89 as GNU extensions as well.
> >
> > An earlier attempt to do this when gcc-5 started defaulting to
> > -std=gnu11 failed because at the time that caused warnings about
> > designated initializers with older compilers. Now that gcc-5.1 is the
> > minimum compiler version used for building kernels, that is no longer a
> > concern. Similarly, the behavior of 'inline' functions changes between
> > gnu89 and gnu11, but this was taken care of by defining 'inline' to
> > include __attribute__((gnu_inline)) in order to allow building with
> > clang a while ago.
> >
> > One minor issue that remains is an added gcc warning for shifts of
> > negative integers when building with -Werror, which happens with the
>
> Is this a typo?
>
> building with -Werror, ...
> ->
> building with -Wextra, ...
>
I'm being slow today, Jani actually pointed out the same thing and I
misunderstood him. Fixed it now, thanks!
> Acked-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
>
>
> Please let me know if you want me to pick up this.
Yes, that would be great. I'll send a v3 with the updated changelog,
but will drop most of the Cc list as there are no functional changes.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-28 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-28 10:27 [PATCH] [v2] Kbuild: move to -std=gnu11 Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-28 10:50 ` Greg KH
2022-02-28 11:25 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-28 11:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-28 18:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-02-28 17:07 ` Masahiro Yamada
2022-02-28 11:47 ` Marco Elver
2022-02-28 11:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-28 16:56 ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-02-28 12:36 ` Jani Nikula
2022-02-28 13:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-02-28 13:19 ` David Sterba
2022-02-28 12:48 ` Alex Shi
2022-02-28 12:56 ` David Sterba
2022-02-28 17:02 ` Masahiro Yamada
2022-02-28 18:24 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2022-02-28 21:03 ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-02-28 21:41 ` Fangrui Song
2022-03-01 14:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-03-01 10:43 ` Miguel Ojeda
2022-03-01 14:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-05-16 13:10 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-05-16 13:31 ` [greybus-dev] " Greg KH
2022-05-16 14:19 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-05-18 7:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-05-18 14:07 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAK8P3a2To9St5=v6EHtJ-LBEp4-NOThPmO+qYeAfnxQPm2_Keg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=alexs@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it \
--cc=greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc-tw-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=src.res@email.cn \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).