From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1757390AbcFAGnC (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 1 Jun 2016 02:43:02 -0400
Received: from mail-oi0-f68.google.com ([209.85.218.68]:33820 "EHLO
	mail-oi0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752209AbcFAGm7 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 1 Jun 2016 02:42:59 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Originating-IP: [2a02:168:56b5:0:ac27:b86c:7764:9429]
In-Reply-To: <20160531190725.505596e3@lwn.net>
References: <cover.1463748027.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
	<877fec7gfm.fsf@intel.com>
	<CAKMK7uGSwf_jd2Nys=yArmA6voGmbyfTP4UAibswT4rU6yi75Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160531190725.505596e3@lwn.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 08:42:58 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKMK7uEeiryR0Y1Zjc6xtqfnuLCc7nMk03EKof3k2OnU1cej-g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Documentation/Sphinx
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
        Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@darmarit.de>,
        Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>,
        Dan Allen <dan@opendevise.io>, Russel Winder <russel@winder.org.uk>,
        Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 30 May 2016 11:10:26 +0200
> Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
>
>> I think next steps is to get this merged into docs-next, with a stable
>> tag, so that I can pull it into drm-misc.
>
> So, I want to take another look at this, which probably will need another
> day or two before it can happen.  First impression, though, is that this
> is great, so I'm expecting that I'll be applying it.
>
> Not sure about the stable tag, though?  It doesn't really seem like
> stable material?

Oh, I meant a git tag of a stable (non-rebasing) branch that I can
pull into drm-misc so that we can apply the gpu.tmpl->gpu.rst
conversion on top. Not a cc: stable tag. Too many kinds of stable tags
I guess ;-)
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch