From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17057C433DB for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 20:33:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF28564F51 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 20:33:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233360AbhCQUdM (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Mar 2021 16:33:12 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49020 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233452AbhCQUcw (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Mar 2021 16:32:52 -0400 Received: from mail-ot1-x336.google.com (mail-ot1-x336.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::336]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30806C06174A for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:32:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-x336.google.com with SMTP id m21-20020a9d7ad50000b02901b83efc84a0so3062551otn.10 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:32:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ffwll.ch; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=IHCnunVxEHDcq+HTDx4ulePq7olKHfoa4KrEracuGEE=; b=F3jWDKeZzOEZZV+TtU/QAqYOuYjLzlwHXLJOUphmL/VTnC00lws/xyjCQFL1MFzEIq cOmU8WIgXcWr8H47lTCo4CJ6guTqcA2xR8IVXUiA4RT0KOFJNwKrTI7IziG13bdXuDmh 1mV45jQA3sCOkiQ18AaiLVLPMdYLhTJRLR/3I= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IHCnunVxEHDcq+HTDx4ulePq7olKHfoa4KrEracuGEE=; b=FCi7c5+uK+Ce+g4wwuPgn7CpXzuSDRwYVFisiulKwq/4KeZaz6IVKWyXYtsmD8tJ1v xwcMzSH64ZGlsz2urwhXQ23t9UvmVBocvWjS7Hvd2z/DbIHxfBkt2Ib1+pAlMe6DSq10 bQdXn0r2FDQMxBJYYCSPoGqdU9zoRChhiUfwoejMZcPt9KGmsMtNs25pqHn+qzDuGMIv aRnE32XcCNvD0YYOzPJv/6oAgCP39a4yiixeeZ4C1taDWJ9ViImgepHNQUxA2ja2wn69 fNnlijmFsM04SjS2AQ17uyeX03PwFDTm5F6aXgQl1DaZxu5pWKvTQ2iBCQBloR/mHOGo rIXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531jLWoPM1hlFVO/qgtvraMF/tYF6GjmJEESLl6dW3CAQIWkmd4t Typhmrg9Q9lc9yVtMyUv34qXTSrlzg2wJrrIG0KSXA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwpaKtWZD5ndm43ILhNLn5AjG91euFm+8cd3zhFc4Jg9VKRXCNzX5CQhv6Shjqegj6++qTq+qWnq/5dHW2jDuI= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6481:: with SMTP id g1mr4590503otl.303.1616013169521; Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:32:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210303134319.3160762-1-lee.jones@linaro.org> <16d4300e-bf29-1e85-317b-53d257890cb9@vmware.com> <20210308091932.GB4931@dell> <20210311135152.GT701493@dell> <20210317081729.GH701493@dell> In-Reply-To: <20210317081729.GH701493@dell> From: Daniel Vetter Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 21:32:38 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RESEND 00/53] Rid GPU from W=1 warnings To: Lee Jones Cc: Roland Scheidegger , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Alex Deucher , amd-gfx list , Anthony Koo , Ben Skeggs , =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_K=C3=B6nig?= , Colin Ian King , Dave Airlie , David Airlie , dri-devel , freedreno , Harry Wentland , Jeremy Kolb , Kuogee Hsieh , Leo Li , "moderated list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" , linux-arm-msm , "open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" , Lyude Paul , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Nouveau Dev , Qinglang Miao , Rob Clark , Rob Clark , Sean Paul , Sumit Semwal , Thomas Zimmermann , VMware Graphics , Zack Rusin Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:17 AM Lee Jones wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Lee Jones wrote: > > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 09:19:32AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote: > > > > On Fri, 05 Mar 2021, Roland Scheidegger wrote: > > > > > > > > > The vmwgfx ones look all good to me, so for > > > > > 23-53: Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger > > > > > That said, they were already signed off by Zack, so not sure what > > > > > happened here. > > > > > > > > Yes, they were accepted at one point, then dropped without a reason. > > > > > > > > Since I rebased onto the latest -next, I had to pluck them back out of > > > > a previous one. > > > > > > They should show up in linux-next again. We merge patches for next merge > > > window even during the current merge window, but need to make sure they > > > don't pollute linux-next. Occasionally the cut off is wrong so patches > > > show up, and then get pulled again. > > > > > > Unfortunately especially the 5.12 merge cycle was very wobbly due to some > > > confusion here. But your patches should all be in linux-next again (they > > > are queued up for 5.13 in drm-misc-next, I checked that). > > > > > > Sorry for the confusion here. > > > > Oh, I see. Well so long as they don't get dropped, I'll be happy. > > > > Thanks for the explanation Daniel > > After rebasing today, all of my GPU patches have remained. Would > someone be kind enough to check that everything is still in order > please? It's still broken somehow. I've kiced Maxime and Maarten again, they're also on this thread. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch