From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: "Dave Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
linux-next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with the drm tree
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 11:06:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKMK7uF+p96YtDo3NG4nBV5S5gYXk55p5KUOxsb+PMY+MH_Zyw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140122140402.20163da276690810a1040909@canb.auug.org.au>
Hi Stephen,
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 4:04 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel tree got a conflict in
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c between commit abca9e454498 ("drm: Pass
> 'flags' from the caller to .get_scanout_position()") from the drm tree
> and commit d59a63ad8234 ("drm/i915: Add intel_get_crtc_scanline()") from
> the drm-intel tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary
> (no action is required).
Oops, this patch escaped - it's only for 3.15. I've shuffled my
branches around now for the merge window so this should not pop up in
your -next tree again until 3.15 starts.
Yours, Daniel
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
>
> diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index 17d8fcb1b6f7,ffb56a9db9cc..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@@ -649,8 -675,9 +649,9 @@@ static bool ilk_pipe_in_vblank_locked(s
> }
>
> static int i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe,
> - int *vpos, int *hpos,
> + unsigned int flags, int *vpos, int *hpos,
> - ktime_t *stime, ktime_t *etime)
> + ktime_t *stime, ktime_t *etime,
> + bool adjust)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> struct drm_crtc *crtc = dev_priv->pipe_to_crtc_mapping[pipe];
> @@@ -788,6 -786,24 +791,24 @@@
> return ret;
> }
>
> + static int i915_get_scanout_position(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe,
> + int *vpos, int *hpos,
> + ktime_t *stime, ktime_t *etime)
> + {
> - return i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(dev, pipe, vpos, hpos,
> ++ return i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(dev, pipe, 0, vpos, hpos,
> + stime, etime, true);
> + }
> +
> + int intel_get_crtc_scanline(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> + {
> + int vpos = 0, hpos = 0;
> +
> - i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(crtc->dev, to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe,
> ++ i915_get_crtc_scanoutpos(crtc->dev, to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe, 0,
> + &vpos, &hpos, NULL, NULL, false);
> +
> + return vpos;
> + }
> +
> static int i915_get_vblank_timestamp(struct drm_device *dev, int pipe,
> int *max_error,
> struct timeval *vblank_time,
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-22 10:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-22 3:04 linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with the drm tree Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-22 10:06 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2014-01-23 1:21 ` Olof Johansson
2014-01-23 21:10 ` Olof Johansson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-10-03 0:09 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-05 14:41 ` Jani Nikula
2023-05-30 1:59 Stephen Rothwell
2023-05-30 1:57 Stephen Rothwell
2023-05-30 2:10 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-01-24 23:42 Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-13 2:19 Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-12 1:46 Stephen Rothwell
2022-02-11 2:06 Stephen Rothwell
2022-02-09 0:55 Stephen Rothwell
2021-08-12 1:28 Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-01 2:13 Stephen Rothwell
2021-03-17 3:08 Stephen Rothwell
2021-03-18 1:52 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-29 22:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-05-14 1:53 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-05-14 12:14 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2021-01-25 0:46 Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-14 2:59 Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-22 3:15 Stephen Rothwell
2019-02-06 0:42 Stephen Rothwell
2019-01-17 1:59 Stephen Rothwell
2017-05-19 2:04 Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-07 3:59 Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-23 3:18 Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-23 3:06 Stephen Rothwell
2014-07-23 5:09 ` Daniel Vetter
2014-04-03 1:00 Stephen Rothwell
2014-01-22 3:09 Stephen Rothwell
2013-11-07 2:37 Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-29 4:09 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-18 3:04 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKMK7uF+p96YtDo3NG4nBV5S5gYXk55p5KUOxsb+PMY+MH_Zyw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).