From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux MM" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"David Rientjes" <rientjes@google.com>,
"Jerome Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm: Check if mmu notifier callbacks are allowed to fail
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 14:15:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKMK7uGViQT5HPEQzFsAT85gdCr-gw94EB5fMT9eXRBAXambWg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181123124358.GJ8625@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 1:43 PM Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Fri 23-11-18 13:30:57, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 12:15:57PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Thu 22-11-18 17:51:04, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > Just a bit of paranoia, since if we start pushing this deep into
> > > > callchains it's hard to spot all places where an mmu notifier
> > > > implementation might fail when it's not allowed to.
> > >
> > > What does WARN give you more than the existing pr_info? Is really
> > > backtrace that interesting?
> >
> > Automated tools have to ignore everything at info level (there's too much
> > of that). I guess I could do something like
> >
> > if (blockable)
> > pr_warn(...)
> > else
> > pr_info(...)
> >
> > WARN() is simply my goto tool for getting something at warning level
> > dumped into dmesg. But I think the pr_warn with the callback function
> > should be enough indeed.
>
> I wouldn't mind s@pr_info@pr_warn@
Well that's too much, because then it would misfire in the oom
testcase, where failing is ok (desireble even, we want to avoid
blocking after all). So needs to be a switch (or else we need to
filter it in results, and that's a bit a maintenance headache from a
CI pov).
-Danile
> > If you wonder where all the info level stuff happens that we have to
> > ignore: suspend/resume is a primary culprit (fairly important for
> > gfx/desktops), but there's a bunch of other places. Even if we ignore
> > everything at info and below we still need filters because some drivers
> > are a bit too trigger-happy (i915 definitely included I guess, so everyone
> > contributes to this problem).
>
> Thanks for the clarification.
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-23 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-22 16:51 [PATCH 0/3] RFC: mmu notifier debug checks Daniel Vetter
2018-11-22 16:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm: Check if mmu notifier callbacks are allowed to fail Daniel Vetter
2018-11-22 16:53 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2018-11-23 8:49 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-23 11:14 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-22 18:50 ` Koenig, Christian
2018-11-23 11:15 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-23 12:30 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-23 12:43 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-23 13:15 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2018-11-23 13:30 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-22 16:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm, notifier: Catch sleeping/blocking for !blockable Daniel Vetter
2018-11-22 18:55 ` Koenig, Christian
2018-11-23 8:46 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-23 10:14 ` Christian König
2018-11-23 11:12 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-23 12:38 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-23 12:46 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-23 13:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-23 13:23 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-11-22 16:51 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm, notifier: Add a lockdep map for invalidate_range_start Daniel Vetter
2018-11-27 7:49 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-27 16:49 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2018-11-27 17:28 ` Daniel Vetter
2018-11-27 17:33 ` Chris Wilson
2018-11-27 17:39 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKMK7uGViQT5HPEQzFsAT85gdCr-gw94EB5fMT9eXRBAXambWg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).