From: Bruce Korb <bruce.korb@gmail.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>,
Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"John L. Hammond" <john.hammond@intel.com>,
Emoly Liu <emoly.liu@intel.com>,
Vitaly Fertman <vitaly_fertman@xyratex.com>,
Bruno Faccini <bruno.faccini@intel.com>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: Designated initializers, struct randomization and addressing?
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 15:55:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKRnqNLs_1zy1v5Ngk0fZ-VBXrh3i2ihqUMVUU1BYeEBd3zAEQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jJUHZi5LUxFjG9XfKgipBpGYfdfUXM8q_xEWqQrqtq1Tw@mail.gmail.com>
As a tangential party, I am a bit curious: does the randomization
plugin result in a compact structure? I ask because I know many/most
programmers don't bother with it and so doing so ought to make the
data more compact.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>> how is the code to be verified so that
>> any use of things like offsetof and any
>> address/indexing is not impacted?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-03 23:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-17 1:00 [PATCH] staging: lustre: ldlm: use designated initializers Kees Cook
2016-12-19 16:22 ` James Simmons
2016-12-19 16:47 ` Bruce Korb
2016-12-19 17:12 ` James Simmons
2016-12-20 7:10 ` Dan Carpenter
2016-12-20 14:57 ` Hammond, John
2016-12-20 16:47 ` Bruce Korb
2016-12-20 18:52 ` Dan Carpenter
2016-12-20 19:07 ` Dan Carpenter
2016-12-20 19:46 ` Kees Cook
[not found] ` <CY4PR11MB175166F4D71AC6994081356BCB910@CY4PR11MB1751.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2016-12-19 17:11 ` [lustre-devel] " James Simmons
2016-12-20 10:40 ` Dan Carpenter
2016-12-20 17:29 ` Designated initializers, struct randomization and addressing? Joe Perches
2017-01-03 23:47 ` Kees Cook
2017-01-03 23:55 ` Bruce Korb [this message]
2017-01-04 0:13 ` Kees Cook
2017-01-04 6:27 ` Julia Lawall
2017-01-04 6:35 ` Kees Cook
2017-01-04 16:55 ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-01-04 17:37 ` Julia Lawall
2017-01-04 22:30 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKRnqNLs_1zy1v5Ngk0fZ-VBXrh3i2ihqUMVUU1BYeEBd3zAEQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=bruce.korb@gmail.com \
--cc=andreas.dilger@intel.com \
--cc=bruno.faccini@intel.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=emoly.liu@intel.com \
--cc=error27@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=john.hammond@intel.com \
--cc=jsimmons@infradead.org \
--cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg.drokin@intel.com \
--cc=vitaly_fertman@xyratex.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).