From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F1B3C33CB1 for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 12:13:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 518A42082F for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 12:13:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="hwT52K1d" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727289AbgAQMNZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jan 2020 07:13:25 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-f195.google.com ([209.85.167.195]:38447 "EHLO mail-oi1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726892AbgAQMNY (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jan 2020 07:13:24 -0500 Received: by mail-oi1-f195.google.com with SMTP id l9so21959395oii.5; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 04:13:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=j9LdKm6yNd5aXn+rN0edQ8Jaz0F5s+sFTFnF9WgkgBY=; b=hwT52K1dJOOsr+O6qALLUpZhk9Jfylg2E/jmuJiqovVYnNtANFj8pHkWHPd3kCTSwT XTVloVKx+xw0fFVM1eIOmElCJ0ZEUKai+JyYq0m2cZ7G83TtZABDckiQgwL35PkuaO16 m5xpG+cjJAr99XFuLFK5gzilba4QRN8ZYKOqbsoGYa/BfDsGTCAWJ+D+bKj0Y6orJQGY ebQisqQHEilstcz2sOsCqnWbyu0ptJOMtss3i7917tMQq6wy7R0iL1wjsLfQFCpCb6gL jgod+mlBxJfVhbp3APRYAoI7AM/hK2KTU/12HDo5qvrHzTHO79z012kCG5kvyWMS5WN2 4tOw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=j9LdKm6yNd5aXn+rN0edQ8Jaz0F5s+sFTFnF9WgkgBY=; b=UH5QBDQrxl0Rr+J/QFW2M9cXUgDe7QDeQ/fGUjmRkDPl67N2VkaEtMd6j7gEEcK+3V vDwSY9brRvAo9mPfAeZ9GSujlgTurHNBkP38rv6gvRm0ljgseIK3gVUlIS0m5lpi4/pP H9fqvc82jX9vgDlVTPSwcCKOb0b5kihspMp+MqEV+oC29od2/ejp3gTlgAZd/Su+BfLd pe/DHABhguStekRfbOOQNfxEE5GZQmipUNUghXT1u/rOFuzPBFPUfC00iBoHzOxRr3Wn FKd3ucYp1iiy6Ac2rXxqGzY9QPMbB9Mc6NMI9VYR28T/wOlA6IJWSKxIlLJGZclq9/cI 3erg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV2IOlDOXsWtdZwcUoMQQK1r4Cj5O+LxqE56ixx42aJ1Z6iZfgn 452yK3SvFjOGcaqY1w6qrWRV66tT8o1Pn4Ds1Nc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyK2sogu8+jyU3vGsF46DTDsA765vsyTHqA+AkGu0AcxB7pNmzp2BD3vbnNDBFAMn6+P87/6TH46HulpscBxmw= X-Received: by 2002:aca:1b08:: with SMTP id b8mr3245485oib.62.1579263203997; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 04:13:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a8a:87:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 04:13:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20200115082447.19520-1-namjae.jeon@samsung.com> <20200115082447.19520-10-namjae.jeon@samsung.com> <20200115133838.q33p5riihsinp6c4@pali> <20200115142428.ugsp3binf2vuiarq@pali> <20200115153943.qw35ya37ws6ftlnt@pali> <002801d5cce2$228d79f0$67a86dd0$@samsung.com> From: Namjae Jeon Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 20:13:23 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 09/14] exfat: add misc operations To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Namjae Jeon , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linux FS-devel Mailing List , gregkh , =?UTF-8?Q?Pali_Roh=C3=A1r?= , Valdis Kletnieks , Christoph Hellwig , sj1557.seo@samsung.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 2020-01-17 18:13 GMT+08:00, Arnd Bergmann : > On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 3:59 AM Namjae Jeon > wrote: >> >> >> > This is what I think the timezone mount option should be used >> > for: if we don't know what the timezone was for the on-disk timestamp, >> > use >> > the one provided by the user. However, if none was specified, it should >> > be >> > either sys_tz or UTC (i.e. no conversion). I would prefer the use of >> > UTC >> > here given the problems with sys_tz, but sys_tz would be more >> > consistent >> > with how fs/fat works. >> Hi Arnd, >> >> Could you please review this change ? > > Looks all good to me now. Thanks for your review!