From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933065AbcHYUa6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Aug 2016 16:30:58 -0400 Received: from mail-ua0-f175.google.com ([209.85.217.175]:36482 "EHLO mail-ua0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932873AbcHYUax (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Aug 2016 16:30:53 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160825194133.GC3296@wotan.suse.de> References: <1466117661-22075-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@kernel.org> <1466117661-22075-3-git-send-email-mcgrof@kernel.org> <20160824203901.GT3296@wotan.suse.de> <20160825194133.GC3296@wotan.suse.de> From: Dmitry Torokhov Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 13:30:51 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] firmware: annotate thou shalt not request fw on init or probe To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: Daniel Vetter , Felix Fietkau , David Woodhouse , =?UTF-8?B?SsO2cmcgUsO2ZGVs?= , Joerg Roedel , Roman Pen , Bjorn Andersson , Ming Lei , Andrew Morton , Michal Marek , Greg KH , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Vikram Mulukutla , Stephen Boyd , Mimi Zohar , Mark Brown , Takashi Iwai , Johannes Berg , Christian Lamparter , Hauke Mehrtens , Josh Boyer , Jiri Slaby , Linus Torvalds , Andy Lutomirski , Wu Fengguang , Richard Purdie , Jacek Anaszewski , "Abhay_Salunke@dell.com" , Julia Lawall , Gilles.Muller@lip6.fr, nicolas.palix@imag.fr, Tom Gundersen , David Howells , Alessandro Rubini , Kevin Cernekee , Kees Cook , Jonathan Corbet , Thierry Martinez , cocci@systeme.lip6.fr, linux-serial , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , linuxppc-dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 01:05:44PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> > Can they use initramfs for this ? >> >> Apparently that's also uncool with the embedded folks. > > What's uncool with embedded folks? To use initramfs for firmware ? > If so can you explain why ? Because it is not needed? If you are embedded you have an option of only compiling drivers and services that you need directly into the kernel, then initramfs is just an extra piece that complicates your boot process. Thanks. -- Dmitry