linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
To: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>,
	LAK <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"xuwei (O)" <xuwei5@huawei.com>,
	"Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>,
	Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@linaro.org>,
	yangyicong@huawei.com,
	"Liguozhu (Kenneth)" <liguozhu@hisilicon.com>,
	linuxarm@openeuler.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: remove redundant test_idle_cores for non-smt
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:11:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtA8GibaRWB_=i3ycR8xT2iFkAn337k_cwrAQOshAi=VGA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210320221432.924-1-song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>

On Sat, 20 Mar 2021 at 23:21, Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com> wrote:
>
> update_idle_core() is only done for the case of sched_smt_present.
> but test_idle_cores() is done for all machines even those without
> smt.
> this could contribute to up 8%+ hackbench performance loss on a
> machine like kunpeng 920 which has no smt. this patch removes the
> redundant test_idle_cores() for non-smt machines.
>
> we run the below hackbench with different -g parameter from 2 to
> 14, for each different g, we run the command 10 times and get the
> average time:
> $ numactl -N 0 hackbench -p -T -l 20000 -g $1
>
> hackbench will report the time which is needed to complete a certain
> number of messages transmissions between a certain number of tasks,
> for example:
> $ numactl -N 0 hackbench -p -T -l 20000 -g 10
> Running in threaded mode with 10 groups using 40 file descriptors each
> (== 400 tasks)
> Each sender will pass 20000 messages of 100 bytes
>
> The below is the result of hackbench w/ and w/o this patch:
> g=    2      4     6       8      10     12      14
> w/o: 1.8151 3.8499 5.5142 7.2491 9.0340 10.7345 12.0929
> w/ : 1.8428 3.7436 5.4501 6.9522 8.2882  9.9535 11.3367
>                           +4.1%  +8.3%  +7.3%   +6.3%
>
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>

Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>

> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 8 +++++---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 2e2ab1e..de42a32 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -6038,9 +6038,11 @@ static inline bool test_idle_cores(int cpu, bool def)
>  {
>         struct sched_domain_shared *sds;
>
> -       sds = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu));
> -       if (sds)
> -               return READ_ONCE(sds->has_idle_cores);
> +       if (static_branch_likely(&sched_smt_present)) {
> +               sds = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc_shared, cpu));
> +               if (sds)
> +                       return READ_ONCE(sds->has_idle_cores);
> +       }
>
>         return def;
>  }
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-22 13:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-20 22:14 [PATCH] sched/fair: remove redundant test_idle_cores for non-smt Barry Song
2021-03-22  4:36 ` Li, Aubrey
2021-03-22  5:08   ` [Linuxarm] " Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)
2021-03-22 10:15 ` Mel Gorman
2021-03-22 11:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-22 13:11 ` Vincent Guittot [this message]
2021-03-23 15:08 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Optimize test_idle_cores() for !SMT tip-bot2 for Barry Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAKfTPtA8GibaRWB_=i3ycR8xT2iFkAn337k_cwrAQOshAi=VGA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=guodong.xu@linaro.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=liguozhu@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@openeuler.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=xuwei5@huawei.com \
    --cc=yangyicong@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).