linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
To: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@linux.dev>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 RESEND]: sched/fair: Revise comment about lb decision matrix
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 10:32:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtAbxAerbV-LBcpm_qHAphhD3uU47k0hu=DDX3k6LS-Aow@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220415022246.14902-1-tao.zhou@linux.dev>

On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 at 04:22, Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> If busiest group type is group_misfit_task, the local
> group type must be group_has_spare according to below
> code in update_sd_pick_busiest():
>
> if (sgs->group_type == group_misfit_task &&
>     (!capacity_greater(capacity_of(env->dst_cpu), sg->sgc->max_capacity) ||
>      sds->local_stat.group_type != group_has_spare))
>          return false;
>
> group type imbalanced and overloaded and fully_busy are filtered in here.
> misfit and asym are filtered before in update_sg_lb_stats().

The behavior has changed with
cad68e552e77 ("sched/fair: Consider misfit tasks when load-balancing")
But we haven't updated the matrix

Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>


> So, change the decision matrix to:
>
> busiest \ local has_spare fully_busy misfit asym imbalanced overloaded
> has_spare        nr_idle   balanced   N/A    N/A  balanced   balanced
> fully_busy       nr_idle   nr_idle    N/A    N/A  balanced   balanced
> misfit_task      force     N/A        N/A    N/A  *N/A*      *N/A*
> asym_packing     force     force      N/A    N/A  force      force
> imbalanced       force     force      N/A    N/A  force      force
> overloaded       force     force      N/A    N/A  force      avg_load
>
> Fixes: 0b0695f2b34a ("sched/fair: Rework load_balance()")
> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou@linux.dev>
> ---
>
> v1 changelog:
> (1) Send to MAINTAINERS/REVIEWS get from `./scripts/get_maintainer.pl`
>     suggested by Dietmar Eggemann.
> (2) Based on v5.18-rc2
>
>
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index d4bd299d67ab..b8c67e7c8cf3 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -9495,7 +9495,7 @@ static inline void calculate_imbalance(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *s
>   * busiest \ local has_spare fully_busy misfit asym imbalanced overloaded
>   * has_spare        nr_idle   balanced   N/A    N/A  balanced   balanced
>   * fully_busy       nr_idle   nr_idle    N/A    N/A  balanced   balanced
> - * misfit_task      force     N/A        N/A    N/A  force      force
> + * misfit_task      force     N/A        N/A    N/A  N/A        N/A
>   * asym_packing     force     force      N/A    N/A  force      force
>   * imbalanced       force     force      N/A    N/A  force      force
>   * overloaded       force     force      N/A    N/A  force      avg_load
> --
> 2.35.2
>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-15  8:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-15  2:22 [PATCH V1 RESEND]: sched/fair: Revise comment about lb decision matrix Tao Zhou
2022-04-15  8:32 ` Vincent Guittot [this message]
2022-04-15 10:03   ` Tao Zhou
2022-04-15 11:33   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-04-15  9:55 Tao Zhou

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAKfTPtAbxAerbV-LBcpm_qHAphhD3uU47k0hu=DDX3k6LS-Aow@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tao.zhou@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).