linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
To: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Remove unused last_load_update_tick rq member
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 14:57:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtAiFpAd7NnQorNajQZn4FV+Nn01yv_KNJcgd+MFLnH1sw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e400d0b1-173f-bcfd-40c0-2e473e14e7ae@arm.com>

On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 14:44, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> wrote:
>
> + Vincent Guittot

Thanks Dietmar

>
> On 20.03.20 14:21, vincent.donnefort@arm.com wrote:
> > From: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
> >
> > The commit 5e83eafbfd3b ("sched/fair: Remove the rq->cpu_load[] update
> > code") eliminated the use case for rq->last_load_update_tick. Removing
> > it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@arm.com>

Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>

> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index 1a9983d..c41ee26 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > @@ -6685,7 +6685,6 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
> >
> >               rq_attach_root(rq, &def_root_domain);
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
> > -             rq->last_load_update_tick = jiffies;
> >               rq->last_blocked_load_update_tick = jiffies;
> >               atomic_set(&rq->nohz_flags, 0);
> >  #endif
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> > index 9ea6478..6e14fad 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> > @@ -860,7 +860,6 @@ struct rq {
> >  #endif
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > -     unsigned long           last_load_update_tick;
> >       unsigned long           last_blocked_load_update_tick;
> >       unsigned int            has_blocked_load;
> >  #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>
> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-20 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-20 13:21 [PATCH] sched: Remove unused last_load_update_tick rq member vincent.donnefort
2020-03-20 13:44 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-03-20 13:57   ` Vincent Guittot [this message]
2020-04-08 12:20 ` [tip: sched/urgent] sched/core: Remove unused rq::last_load_update_tick tip-bot2 for Vincent Donnefort

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKfTPtAiFpAd7NnQorNajQZn4FV+Nn01yv_KNJcgd+MFLnH1sw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.donnefort@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).