linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
	Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
	Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] sched/fair: Tweak misfit-related capacity checks
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 18:17:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtB_aJE0uDmARvKGe8_oX0Goaada_C5HKy7aaTbFGLxU-A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jhjv9b61md0.mognet@arm.com>

On Fri, 5 Feb 2021 at 18:00, Valentin Schneider
<valentin.schneider@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On 05/02/21 15:31, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 19:32, Valentin Schneider
> > <valentin.schneider@arm.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> During load-balance, groups classified as group_misfit_task are filtered
> >> out if they do not pass
> >>
> >>   group_smaller_max_cpu_capacity(<candidate group>, <local group>);
> >
> > group_smaller_max_cpu_capacity and  group_smaller_max_cpu_capacity are
> > removed in the next patch. Merge this and the next and directly remove
> > them
> >
>
> OK.
>
> >> @@ -8253,7 +8260,7 @@ check_cpu_capacity(struct rq *rq, struct sched_domain *sd)
> >>  static inline int check_misfit_status(struct rq *rq, struct sched_domain *sd)
> >>  {
> >>         return rq->misfit_task_load &&
> >> -               (rq->cpu_capacity_orig < rq->rd->max_cpu_capacity ||
> >> +               (capacity_greater(rq->rd->max_cpu_capacity, rq->cpu_capacity_orig) ||
> >
> > Why do you add a margin here whereas there was no margin before ?
> >
>
> Comparing capacities without any sort of filter can lead to ping-ponging
> tasks around (capacity values very easily fluctuate by +/- 1, if not more).

max_cpu_capacity reflects the max of the cpu_capacity_orig values
don't aim to change and can be considered as static values.
It would be better to fix this rounding problem (if any) in
topology_get_cpu_scale instead of computing a margin every time it's
used

> I'm guilty of doing two things at once here: replace existing users, and
> convert callsites that should be existing users. I can split the conversion
> in a separate patch.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-05 17:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-28 18:31 [PATCH 0/8] sched/fair: misfit task load-balance tweaks Valentin Schneider
2021-01-28 18:31 ` [PATCH 1/8] sched/fair: Clean up active balance nr_balance_failed trickery Valentin Schneider
2021-02-03 15:14   ` Qais Yousef
2021-02-03 18:42     ` Valentin Schneider
2021-02-04 15:05       ` Qais Yousef
2021-02-05 13:51   ` Vincent Guittot
2021-02-05 14:05     ` Valentin Schneider
2021-02-05 14:34       ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-28 18:31 ` [PATCH 2/8] sched/fair: Add more sched_asym_cpucapacity static branch checks Valentin Schneider
2021-02-03 15:14   ` Qais Yousef
2021-02-09  8:42   ` Vincent Guittot
2021-01-28 18:31 ` [PATCH 3/8] sched/fair: Tweak misfit-related capacity checks Valentin Schneider
2021-02-03 15:15   ` Qais Yousef
2021-02-03 18:42     ` Valentin Schneider
2021-02-05 14:31   ` Vincent Guittot
2021-02-05 16:59     ` Valentin Schneider
2021-02-05 17:17       ` Vincent Guittot [this message]
2021-02-05 20:07         ` Valentin Schneider
2021-02-08 15:29           ` Vincent Guittot
2021-02-08 17:49             ` Valentin Schneider
2021-01-28 18:31 ` [PATCH 4/8] sched/fair: Use dst_cpu's capacity rather than group {min, max} capacity Valentin Schneider
2021-02-03 15:15   ` Qais Yousef
2021-01-28 18:31 ` [PATCH 5/8] sched/fair: Make check_misfit_status() only compare dynamic capacities Valentin Schneider
2021-02-03 15:15   ` Qais Yousef
2021-02-04 10:49     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2021-02-04 11:34       ` Valentin Schneider
2021-02-04 14:57         ` Dietmar Eggemann
2021-01-28 18:31 ` [PATCH 6/8] sched/fair: Filter out locally-unsolvable misfit imbalances Valentin Schneider
2021-02-03 15:16   ` Qais Yousef
2021-02-03 18:43     ` Valentin Schneider
2021-01-28 18:31 ` [PATCH 7/8] sched/fair: Attempt misfit active balance when migration_type != migrate_misfit Valentin Schneider
2021-02-03 15:16   ` Qais Yousef
2021-02-03 18:43     ` Valentin Schneider
2021-02-04 11:44       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2021-02-04 12:22         ` Valentin Schneider
2021-02-09  8:58   ` Vincent Guittot
2021-02-09 18:19     ` Valentin Schneider
2021-01-28 18:31 ` [PATCH 8/8] sched/fair: Relax task_hot() for misfit tasks Valentin Schneider
2021-02-03 15:17   ` Qais Yousef
2021-02-08 16:21   ` Vincent Guittot
2021-02-08 18:24     ` Valentin Schneider
2021-02-09  8:56       ` Vincent Guittot
2021-02-03 15:14 ` [PATCH 0/8] sched/fair: misfit task load-balance tweaks Qais Yousef
2021-02-03 18:43   ` Valentin Schneider
2021-02-04 12:03     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2021-02-04 12:36       ` Valentin Schneider

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKfTPtB_aJE0uDmARvKGe8_oX0Goaada_C5HKy7aaTbFGLxU-A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pkondeti@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).