From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EACE1C35DE1 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 13:28:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD11D20658 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 13:28:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="nHg3n63C" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729436AbgBYN2b (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 08:28:31 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-f68.google.com ([209.85.167.68]:36414 "EHLO mail-lf1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725788AbgBYN2b (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 08:28:31 -0500 Received: by mail-lf1-f68.google.com with SMTP id f24so9773422lfh.3 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 05:28:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=dN3nklLh7iurBWH/UJXuipp0J1sWWgcAqmwXBEBoy0U=; b=nHg3n63CTCpz4DEPtME/gXivdxRFXAg50TUq8/vcR0zAaaGEff/9v8/fCmVblZRW9Q vniun1gTztuq4WPovSIDFHjqLU1Y7qD/l9vfkzRuImdCSGdXH7a9MdavDkjWm4yRBqCM 4ljDlVkHmBEiOMmnFxSKVFME3llOuR9HI3qey/pJg1ISNgg1txxEAKtjERtUqb+rgdcP HhKw++MrNmkN3T8GPoXdSWFeU5/dBDtQmTlwruWg6mmp7ko7GfTtNOQmyyGOX8dZGGQF 82dxlmKlePiyI6MsQG+B1wpI0xSbj7wNJlaRybL6jMUDwnlBs5l1HjHmThGINJStZI6j 264Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dN3nklLh7iurBWH/UJXuipp0J1sWWgcAqmwXBEBoy0U=; b=XuN4qhEICQ1jjx7bSEikuQh1W2Xv4r5ZFUyFqn6XYj/mlejRnwAm4wC7cVQHxKyIMn r1lk0pZbdiaQVw4r1sGBOsFiGu6C9UjPNmHnTqdmGUdHoq7XCVZEiwSZ9QEY+5UwSITP naVX3UJQrQQBVNHTamgz2Aa4MontU+MOWer8tj2YrmHM5YANVH9jfq5ZT3lFwSMPnCeZ r0YXIWEq+ZQBlorrUPbGjwZjnIPOxlml9aL8UotSuQfOzvIYsbrhDrXmQaMZkGnlw2Ja SWLU3WntytmqfljHwJR1LZ/vme7YkbTeL7dk8DxLj5z+85D4kQvAn9I+h47PSSbLj8u4 z/4A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXNmdTjatBYkaVcxvTOmp07VcPZrYqVtzp9tdW6tBjqn7MXtTUn UPUV/YbXyylgKdfPFr99z2DzxvV8zXVWG4NP36LVKg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwI88JXS8cPaahsAw4faFuvHw4zBrJlJDpAxF5rQm8C/i5fWixRyqbaPdexBGZNsdqo3ImTLzD4pk4K3FTIbAg= X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5492:: with SMTP id t18mr13522828lfk.184.1582637307767; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 05:28:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200224095223.13361-1-mgorman@techsingularity.net> <20200224151641.GA24316@gmail.com> <20200225115901.GB3466@techsingularity.net> In-Reply-To: <20200225115901.GB3466@techsingularity.net> From: Vincent Guittot Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:28:16 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] Reconcile NUMA balancing decisions with the load balancer v6 To: Mel Gorman Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Valentin Schneider , Phil Auld , Hillf Danton , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 at 12:59, Mel Gorman wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 04:16:41PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Mel Gorman wrote: > > > > > The only differences in V6 are due to Vincent's latest patch series. > > > > > > This is V5 which includes the latest versions of Vincent's patch > > > addressing review feedback. Patches 4-9 are Vincent's work plus one > > > important performance fix. Vincent's patches were retested and while > > > not presented in detail, it was mostly an improvement. > > > > > > Changelog since V5: > > > o Import Vincent's latest patch set > > > > > include/linux/sched.h | 31 ++- > > > include/trace/events/sched.h | 49 ++-- > > > kernel/sched/core.c | 13 - > > > kernel/sched/debug.c | 17 +- > > > kernel/sched/fair.c | 626 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- > > > kernel/sched/pelt.c | 59 ++-- > > > kernel/sched/sched.h | 42 ++- > > > 7 files changed, 535 insertions(+), 302 deletions(-) > > > > Applied to tip:sched/core for v5.7 inclusion, thanks Mel and Vincent! > > > > Thanks! > > > Please base future iterations on top of a0f03b617c3b (current > > sched/core). > > > > Will do. > > However I noticed that "sched/fair: Fix find_idlest_group() to handle > CPU affinity" did not make it to tip/sched/core. Peter seemed to think it > was fine. Was it rejected or is it just sitting in Peter's queue somewhere? The patch has already reached mainline through tip/sched-urgent-for-linus > > -- > Mel Gorman > SUSE Labs