linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] mm/page_alloc: fix and rework pfn handling in memmap_init_zone()
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 13:35:29 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKgT0UdFphMbS04NMRYU=VUmbnVi_purz4UA0cqA3dd7YW-pJA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200113144035.10848-2-david@redhat.com>

On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 6:40 AM David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Let's update the pfn manually whenever we continue the loop. This makes
> the code easier to read but also less error prone (and we can directly
> fix one issue).
>
> When overlap_memmap_init() returns true, pfn is updated to
> "memblock_region_memory_end_pfn(r)". So it already points at the *next*
> pfn to process. Incrementing the pfn another time is wrong, we might
> leave one uninitialized. I spotted this by inspecting the code, so I have
> no idea if this is relevant in practise (with kernelcore=mirror).
>
> Fixes: a9a9e77fbf27 ("mm: move mirrored memory specific code outside of memmap_init_zone")
> Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
>  mm/page_alloc.c | 9 ++++++---
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index a41bd7341de1..a92791512077 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -5905,18 +5905,20 @@ void __meminit memmap_init_zone(unsigned long size, int nid, unsigned long zone,
>         }
>  #endif
>
> -       for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn++) {
> +       for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; ) {
>                 /*
>                  * There can be holes in boot-time mem_map[]s handed to this
>                  * function.  They do not exist on hotplugged memory.
>                  */
>                 if (context == MEMMAP_EARLY) {
>                         if (!early_pfn_valid(pfn)) {
> -                               pfn = next_pfn(pfn) - 1;
> +                               pfn = next_pfn(pfn);
>                                 continue;
>                         }
> -                       if (!early_pfn_in_nid(pfn, nid))
> +                       if (!early_pfn_in_nid(pfn, nid)) {
> +                               pfn++;
>                                 continue;
> +                       }
>                         if (overlap_memmap_init(zone, &pfn))
>                                 continue;
>                         if (defer_init(nid, pfn, end_pfn))

I'm pretty sure this is a bit broken. The overlap_memmap_init is going
to return memblock_region_memory_end_pfn instead of the start of the
next region. I think that is going to stick you in a mirrored region
without advancing in that case. You would also need to have that case
do a pfn++ before the continue;

> @@ -5944,6 +5946,7 @@ void __meminit memmap_init_zone(unsigned long size, int nid, unsigned long zone,
>                         set_pageblock_migratetype(page, MIGRATE_MOVABLE);
>                         cond_resched();
>                 }
> +               pfn++;
>         }
>  }
>
> --
> 2.24.1
>
>

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-03 21:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-13 14:40 [PATCH v1 0/2] mm/page_alloc: memmap_init_zone() cleanups David Hildenbrand
2020-01-13 14:40 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] mm/page_alloc: fix and rework pfn handling in memmap_init_zone() David Hildenbrand
2020-02-03 21:35   ` Alexander Duyck [this message]
2020-02-03 21:44     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-03 23:17       ` Alexander Duyck
2020-02-04  8:40         ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-13 14:40 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] mm: factor out next_present_section_nr() David Hildenbrand
2020-01-13 22:41   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2020-01-13 22:57     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-13 23:02       ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-14 10:41         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2020-01-14 10:49           ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-14 15:52             ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2020-01-14 16:50               ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-14 16:52                 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-01-31  4:30 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] mm/page_alloc: memmap_init_zone() cleanups Andrew Morton
2020-02-03 14:49   ` Kirill A. Shutemov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAKgT0UdFphMbS04NMRYU=VUmbnVi_purz4UA0cqA3dd7YW-pJA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).