From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752038AbeCOBsp (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2018 21:48:45 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-f194.google.com ([209.85.220.194]:39142 "EHLO mail-qk0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751711AbeCOBsm (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Mar 2018 21:48:42 -0400 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELsXmVGtfJVwX+/qBtQuaObKcsyVpATAjdBEPYJrTAsJySdAU+wQGiNMzGnCpVVWB+b5Ki/DWHd6i0ZJmxG9ErQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1520997629-17361-4-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> References: <1520997629-17361-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <1520997629-17361-4-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> From: Alexander Duyck Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 18:48:40 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] igbvf: eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs To: Sinan Kaya Cc: Netdev , Timur Tabi , sulrich@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Jeff Kirsher , intel-wired-lan , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 8:20 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote: > Code includes wmb() followed by writel(). writel() already has a barrier > on some architectures like arm64. > > This ends up CPU observing two barriers back to back before executing the > register write. > > Since code already has an explicit barrier call, changing writel() to > writel_relaxed(). > > Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c > index 4214c15..fe3441b 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c > @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static void igbvf_alloc_rx_buffers(struct igbvf_ring *rx_ring, > * such as IA-64). > */ > wmb(); > - writel(i, adapter->hw.hw_addr + rx_ring->tail); > + writel_relaxed(i, adapter->hw.hw_addr + rx_ring->tail); > } > } > This one missed the writel at the end of igbvf_tx_queue_adv().