From: Martin Fernandez <martin.fernandez@eclypsium.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
ardb@kernel.org, dvhart@infradead.org, andy@infradead.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, daniel.gutson@eclypsium.com,
hughsient@gmail.com, alex.bazhaniuk@eclypsium.com,
alison.schofield@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/6] x86/e820: Refactor range_update and range_remove
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 11:14:39 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKgze5YFMugCsum8SX+qE26BwxQRW0Uu2qKjEYusFerqk3cEMA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YgtR++NUG3w6DH11@kernel.org>
On 2/15/22, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 06:01:21PM -0300, Martin Fernandez wrote:
>> On 2/8/22, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 01:45:40PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>> >> On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 01:43:25PM -0300, Martin Fernandez wrote:
>> >> > __e820__range_update and e820__range_remove had a very similar
>> >> > implementation with a few lines different from each other, the lines
>> >> > that actually perform the modification over the e820_table. The
>> >> > similiraties were found in the checks for the different cases on how
>> >> > each entry intersects with the given range (if it does at all).
>> >> > These
>> >> > checks were very presice and error prone so it was not a good idea
>> >> > to
>> >> > have them in both places.
>> >>
>> >> Yay removing copy/paste code! :)
>> >
>> > Removing copy/paste is nice but diffstat of
>> >
>> > arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 383 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>> > 1 file changed, 283 insertions(+), 100 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > does not look nice even accounting for lots of comments :(
>> >
>> > I didn't look closely, but diffstat clues that the refactoring making
>> > things much more complex.
>> >
>>
>> Yes, that diffstat surprised me as well.
>>
>> I have to mention that 110 of those lines are kerneldocs and blank
>> lines, which is quite a lot. Also you have to take into account that I
>> expanded most of the function definitions for better formatting, which
>> also took some space.
>
> At last I had time to look more closely and I think that using a set of
> callbacks is over-complicated.
>
> I think this can be done way simpler, e.g like this (untested) draft:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/rppt/h/x86/e820-update-range
>
Thanks for taking the time to reviewing it.
Yeah, I did something like that in a previous version. Altough I
wasn't really happy with that.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-efi/20220113213027.457282-4-martin.fernandez@eclypsium.com/
I think that with the struct with the function arguments looks more
clear than what I did, but you have to take into account that I need
to create yet
another function similar to those and another parameter to the struct,
and with that I think that __e820__range_update will look scary.
I'll give it a try anyway!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-15 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-03 16:43 [PATCH v6 0/6] x86: Show in sysfs if a memory node is able to do encryption Martin Fernandez
2022-02-03 16:43 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] mm/memblock: Tag memblocks with crypto capabilities Martin Fernandez
2022-02-03 18:07 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-02-03 18:24 ` Martin Fernandez
2022-02-07 21:18 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-08 14:39 ` Martin Fernandez
2022-02-03 16:43 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] mm/mmzone: Tag pg_data_t " Martin Fernandez
2022-02-07 21:19 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-03 16:43 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] x86/e820: Refactor range_update and range_remove Martin Fernandez
2022-02-07 21:45 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-08 8:40 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-02-08 21:01 ` Martin Fernandez
2022-02-15 7:10 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-02-15 14:14 ` Martin Fernandez [this message]
2022-02-08 21:09 ` Martin Fernandez
2022-03-04 20:32 ` Martin Fernandez
2022-02-08 21:04 ` Daniel Gutson
2022-02-03 16:43 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] x86/e820: Tag e820_entry with crypto capabilities Martin Fernandez
2022-02-07 21:56 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-08 14:46 ` Martin Fernandez
2022-02-03 16:43 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] x86/efi: Tag e820_entries as crypto capable from EFI memmap Martin Fernandez
2022-02-03 16:43 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] drivers/node: Show in sysfs node's crypto capabilities Martin Fernandez
2022-02-04 3:47 ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-02-04 13:21 ` Martin Fernandez
2022-02-04 15:59 ` Tom Lendacky
2022-02-04 16:23 ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-02-04 16:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-02-04 17:12 ` Tom Lendacky
2022-02-04 17:49 ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-02-04 18:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-02-04 18:49 ` Tom Lendacky
2022-02-04 21:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-02-07 3:39 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-07 10:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-02-04 4:56 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-02-04 12:27 ` Martin Fernandez
2022-02-04 13:37 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKgze5YFMugCsum8SX+qE26BwxQRW0Uu2qKjEYusFerqk3cEMA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=martin.fernandez@eclypsium.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.bazhaniuk@eclypsium.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=andy@infradead.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=daniel.gutson@eclypsium.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=hughsient@gmail.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).