From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757220Ab3BFIvP (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2013 03:51:15 -0500 Received: from mail-qa0-f41.google.com ([209.85.216.41]:50024 "EHLO mail-qa0-f41.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757193Ab3BFIvN (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Feb 2013 03:51:13 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <74F10842A85F514CA8D8C487E74474BB2D2F925E@P-EXMB1-DC21.corp.sgi.com> <1360116290-23849-1-git-send-email-nzimmer@sgi.com> <1360116290-23849-3-git-send-email-nzimmer@sgi.com> Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2013 14:21:11 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 linux-next 2/2] cpufreq: Convert the cpufreq_driver_lock to use the rcu From: Viresh Kumar To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Nathan Zimmer , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 6 February 2013 08:22, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 6 February 2013 07:34, Nathan Zimmer wrote: >> In general rwlocks are discourged so we are moving it to use the rcu instead. >> >> Cc: Viresh Kumar >> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" >> Signed-off-by: Nathan Zimmer >> --- >> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 173 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- >> 1 file changed, 96 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-) > > bleeding-edge got updated again and this patch would have conflicts :) > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar Rafael, I have applied them over bleeding-edge after resolving few conflicts. Please pick them up from: Branch: for-rafael Repo: git://git.linaro.org/people/vireshk/linux.git http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/vireshk/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-rafael I have got my other cpufreq work too in that repo: http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/vireshk/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/cpufreq-updates