From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753950AbaBDFOd (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 4 Feb 2014 00:14:33 -0500
Received: from mail-oa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.219.52]:37340 "EHLO
	mail-oa0-f52.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752000AbaBDFOK (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 4 Feb 2014 00:14:10 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqLVABkE=FAefKthjn-oLitsDitJOktjqGwXM_Rqp3A5jQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1391295009-10844-1-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com>
	<CAKohpomT2Nu2B7-jMA=776N4L9pknsYxvT5QdiHkKk3Ubwivjg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAL_JsqLVABkE=FAefKthjn-oLitsDitJOktjqGwXM_Rqp3A5jQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 10:44:09 +0530
Message-ID: <CAKohpo=Q=J1je9jkaDj2nrG9vrbrJvc7kj4KzP=UFeEJbdhvng@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: cpu0: make THERMAL_CPU support optional
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        "cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 3 February 2014 21:44, Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> wrote:
> That's certainly fine by me, but I don't know which platforms those are.

Probably OMAP as the author came from TI and has tested it on OMAPs

https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/26/787

> BTW, REGULATOR could probably be dropped as well. It certainly works
> w/o a regulator as highbank does not define one.

Sure. Get that out as well in the same patch.