From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755449Ab3BVCUD (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:20:03 -0500 Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]:53610 "EHLO mail-ob0-f172.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755219Ab3BVCT7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:19:59 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6210802.HjCYHcMl5j@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <3793606.bilcxohA80@vostro.rjw.lan> <6210802.HjCYHcMl5j@vostro.rjw.lan> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 07:49:59 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/4] cpufreq: Add per policy governor-init/exit infrastructure From: Viresh Kumar To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robin.randhawa@arm.com, Steve.Bannister@arm.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, charles.garcia-tobin@arm.com, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, francescolavra.fl@gmail.com, toddpoynor@google.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 22 February 2013 07:51, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, February 22, 2013 07:38:12 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: >> No. These are used atleast for ondemand & conservative. > > They will be after the next patch, you mean? :-) > Well, it appeared so from the next patch ... Yes :)